trouble with sync delay
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:55 pm
I have recently bought a new desktop because my laptop died. Its a horse of a thing - Pentium D 3Ghz, 2Gb RAM, 800MHz front side bus...
I have installed my M-audio FW410 soundcard that I had used with the laptop and I'm trying to get things up and running again.
My main machines are a Yamaha RM1X and an Access Virus, which I have set up to be the master clock source for sync. i set Live to EXT and the hardware controls start/stop/tempo. This all worked beautifully with the laptop (P4 2.6, 768Mb Ram, Win XP pro), but i'm having problems with the new PC and Live..
I go to set up the sync delay (used to be about -24ms on the laptop), by playing a simple 4/4 drum part from the RM1x and running a simple 4/4 drum part on the Impulse and adjusting the sync delay as they play... nothing is happening!! no matter wether its +300ms or -300ms or anywhere in between, there doesn't seem to be any difference in the sync adjustment.
I am wondering...
...is it the Windows XP media center edition? (I could not upgrade to pro when buying from Dell cause XP pro is not compatible with the Pentium D (dual core) processor.. the media centre edition is apparantly newly designed for the PD processor)
... Or is the processor itself?
Or am I missing something? As I say, all worked fine with the less powerful previous machine....
I have installed my M-audio FW410 soundcard that I had used with the laptop and I'm trying to get things up and running again.
My main machines are a Yamaha RM1X and an Access Virus, which I have set up to be the master clock source for sync. i set Live to EXT and the hardware controls start/stop/tempo. This all worked beautifully with the laptop (P4 2.6, 768Mb Ram, Win XP pro), but i'm having problems with the new PC and Live..
I go to set up the sync delay (used to be about -24ms on the laptop), by playing a simple 4/4 drum part from the RM1x and running a simple 4/4 drum part on the Impulse and adjusting the sync delay as they play... nothing is happening!! no matter wether its +300ms or -300ms or anywhere in between, there doesn't seem to be any difference in the sync adjustment.
I am wondering...
...is it the Windows XP media center edition? (I could not upgrade to pro when buying from Dell cause XP pro is not compatible with the Pentium D (dual core) processor.. the media centre edition is apparantly newly designed for the PD processor)
... Or is the processor itself?
Or am I missing something? As I say, all worked fine with the less powerful previous machine....