more intelligent RAM use for samples: sample caching
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 3:02 am
Its really too bad that a great program like Live is so I/O bound to the hard-disk for samples when loads of RAM is available (1Gb in my machine).
Here's how this might be solved:
If Live were to simply cache samples in RAM that were used often according to maybe a size theshold setting- lots of RAM disk activity could be alleviated and also allow more simultaneous tracks with slower disks/interface combos (such as ATA drives). I had to switch up to U160 SCSI interface and drive to play more than 12 layers, and that is not cool.
I compose my tracks in Logic Audio with only an ATA drive on an old Mac G4- and it must have some kind of intelligent cache for audio, because I can have loads of audio tracks mixed without a problem.
Thanks guys!
Here's how this might be solved:
If Live were to simply cache samples in RAM that were used often according to maybe a size theshold setting- lots of RAM disk activity could be alleviated and also allow more simultaneous tracks with slower disks/interface combos (such as ATA drives). I had to switch up to U160 SCSI interface and drive to play more than 12 layers, and that is not cool.
I compose my tracks in Logic Audio with only an ATA drive on an old Mac G4- and it must have some kind of intelligent cache for audio, because I can have loads of audio tracks mixed without a problem.
Thanks guys!