still no time signature automation?
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:28 am
or am i just not looking in the right place?
pretty bizarre, but yeah, looks like we'd have to wait another year.snowtires wrote:or am i just not looking in the right place?
Alert! Warning! Prog-rock basher alert!Hyperion wrote:More than 1 time signatute in a song is ugly...
maybe in a techno/trance song it's ugly, but there are about a million and a half rock songs that change time signatures.Hyperion wrote:More than 1 time signatute in a song is ugly...
not to mention nearly every classical piece and lots of jazz too!snowtires wrote:maybe in a techno/trance song it's ugly, but there are about a million and a half rock songs that change time signatures.Hyperion wrote:More than 1 time signatute in a song is ugly...
If 'Money' by Pink Floyd is so ugly why was it selling so many units for so damn long. What an insipid 'I can barely count to three' comment...Hyperion wrote:More than 1 time signatute in a song is ugly...
Maybe to those without the talent to implement multiple time signatures to good effect, or to those close-minded enough to think that everyone is stuck in a constant-time-signature mindset.Hyperion wrote:More than 1 time signatute in a song is ugly...