Ableton should censor posts about piracy
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:26 pm
Ableton should censor posts about piracy
I resent any mention of crack copies on this forum. Together those of us who pay for legitimate licences are directly subsidising the thieves who use crack copies.
I don't want to read about their inane arguments as to why they think they have some moral right to rip off both Ableton and also the legitimate supporters of Ableton who fund further development by paying for the licence.
If you can't afford it, you clearly should be spending your time getting a job rather than pfaffing around with Live.
Ableton, please censor these threads.
I don't want to read about their inane arguments as to why they think they have some moral right to rip off both Ableton and also the legitimate supporters of Ableton who fund further development by paying for the licence.
If you can't afford it, you clearly should be spending your time getting a job rather than pfaffing around with Live.
Ableton, please censor these threads.
I can't vote on this because neither of the options are suitable.
If you have censorship, you remove all rights to discussion, freedom of speech etc.
I believe that this board should stay unmoderated and uncensored. All or nothing. If you can have the pictures of poo, you can have discussions on software piracy.
Anybody who comes on this board promoting or encouraging pirate copies of Live usually ends up punished anyway (flamed, not given help with anything etc) so I don't see the point of censoring this.
my 2p's worth
If you have censorship, you remove all rights to discussion, freedom of speech etc.
I believe that this board should stay unmoderated and uncensored. All or nothing. If you can have the pictures of poo, you can have discussions on software piracy.
Anybody who comes on this board promoting or encouraging pirate copies of Live usually ends up punished anyway (flamed, not given help with anything etc) so I don't see the point of censoring this.
my 2p's worth
+1lummux wrote:I can't vote on this because neither of the options are suitable.
If you have censorship, you remove all rights to discussion, freedom of speech etc.
I believe that this board should stay unmoderated and uncensored. All or nothing. If you can have the pictures of poo, you can have discussions on software piracy.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:26 pm
well my 1ps worth is that the only conclusion to a discussion on piracy is that it is wrong. Thus the only purpose such threads have is to promote theft.
No argument about a luxury item that starts with "I steal it because ..." has any merit.
Even in an free democracy we don't permit public gatherings for criminals to openly promote the committing of the crime of theft of luxury goods (or software)
Why should we do it here? Let alone on the company's website.
We legitimate licence holders fund Ableton and the future of Live. Those who steal from us have no rights - they happily deny Ableton their rights, and then gloat about it on their website.
Away with them I say!
No argument about a luxury item that starts with "I steal it because ..." has any merit.
Even in an free democracy we don't permit public gatherings for criminals to openly promote the committing of the crime of theft of luxury goods (or software)
Why should we do it here? Let alone on the company's website.
We legitimate licence holders fund Ableton and the future of Live. Those who steal from us have no rights - they happily deny Ableton their rights, and then gloat about it on their website.
Away with them I say!
Last edited by the last one on Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ableton should censor posts about piracy
fuck off you fucking WANKERthe last one wrote:I resent any mention of crack copies on this forum. Together those of us who pay for legitimate licences are directly subsidising the thieves who use crack copies.
I don't want to read about their inane arguments as to why they think they have some moral right to rip off both Ableton and also the legitimate supporters of Ableton who fund further development by paying for the licence.
If you can't afford it, you clearly should be spending your time getting a job rather than pfaffing around with Live.
Ableton, please censor these threads.
(i've paid for my copy of live, by the way)
spreader of butter
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:33 am
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Ableton should censor posts about piracy
fuck off you fucking PRICKthe last one wrote:I resent any mention of crack copies on this forum. Together those of us who pay for legitimate licences are directly subsidising the thieves who use crack copies.
I don't want to read about their inane arguments as to why they think they have some moral right to rip off both Ableton and also the legitimate supporters of Ableton who fund further development by paying for the licence.
If you can't afford it, you clearly should be spending your time getting a job rather than pfaffing around with Live.
Ableton, please censor these threads.
Morals are not universal, so don't go forcing yours upon everyone else.
Last edited by Funkstar De Luxe on Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:26 pm
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:33 am
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
i mean of course they should not allow links to cracked downloads, but deleting posts would not help the problem.
maybe they could use the information provided - I think it is illegal to help/protect a thief in most countries, so what does a guy say to the police if they ask him about his friend.
best
maybe they could use the information provided - I think it is illegal to help/protect a thief in most countries, so what does a guy say to the police if they ask him about his friend.
best
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:33 am
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
It's their forum and their products, so they can do what they want. However I have the greatest respect form them not burying their heads in the sand and banning everyone who admits the existence of cracks.steff3 wrote:i mean of course they should not allow links to cracked downloads, but deleting posts would not help the problem.
maybe they could use the information provided - I think it is illegal to help/protect a thief in most countries, so what does a guy say to the police if they ask him about his friend.
best
I'm sure Ableton are making more than enough to get by, and generally the people who Warez would not buy the original product anyway - so it's not as big of a sales loss as you may think.
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:26 pm
Funkstar De Luxe wrote: I'm sure Ableton are making more than enough to get by
This certainty is based on your inside knowledge of Ableton's finances? What is their marketing budget? Monthly development and support cost? Do you actually know?
If 1000 people just paid to upgrade to Live 6 from 5, how many weeks of running costs do you think that covers?
More likely you are making crack-apologist assumptions based on no facts whatsoever.
Even if you are right, and Ableton is "making more than enough" is that any justification to steal from them? How do you decide how much enough is?
vsFunkstar De Luxe wrote: generally the people who Warez would not buy the original product anyway
Clearly Funkstar and the other demographics expert, b0unce, totally contradict one another with their pro-crack arguments.b0unce wrote: -LOADS- of people go on to buy the product after using the crack for a while
Where do you guys get your facts from, I'd love to know... You wouldn't just be making assumptions based on no knowledge or experience whatsoever by any chance?Funkstar De Luxe wrote: so it's not as big of a sales loss as you may think.
Last edited by the last one on Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:33 am
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
[quote="lummux"]I can't vote on this because neither of the options are suitable.
If you have censorship, you remove all rights to discussion, freedom of speech etc.
[/quote]
Sorry, I think there is the same error made like with the Hippies and freedom. Freedom of speech is not a value on its own. Of course freedom of speech valency, but it should not be considered as a value on its own. If one only tells lies and does harm with that I think it would be wrong to claim feedom of speech. (look at the governments of western countries over the last centuries)
best
If you have censorship, you remove all rights to discussion, freedom of speech etc.
[/quote]
Sorry, I think there is the same error made like with the Hippies and freedom. Freedom of speech is not a value on its own. Of course freedom of speech valency, but it should not be considered as a value on its own. If one only tells lies and does harm with that I think it would be wrong to claim feedom of speech. (look at the governments of western countries over the last centuries)
best