Page 1 of 1
WOW!
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:23 pm
by diemie

What the hell!?!?!!!
http://www.genoqs.net
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:26 pm
by mrweasel
Wow for the price too: 1999 EUR (excl Vat)
This is taking the piss

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:04 pm
by The Phat Conductor
that's just silly.
i mean, i like wood on my gear as much as the ne3xt guy, but honestly... and the treble and bass clefs? CHEEZE!
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:19 pm
by Machinate
It might be expensive and all, but it's also the most sophisticated step sequencing instrument out there...
2000 euro for a vintage guitar is pocket change, why should this boutique item be any different?
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:59 pm
by eamoon
That thing looks seriously hot:
Call mutatorfunctions on selected step: TGL, CLR, RND, unZOM, CPY, PST
unZOM! I've been waiting for unZOM for years!
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:29 pm
by jb61264
sorry for the ignorance here but when i looked at this i said "what the hell is that for?" and seriously, the tiny little silver buttons and all...yuck!
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:54 pm
by The Phat Conductor
Machinate wrote:It might be expensive and all, but it's also the most sophisticated step sequencing instrument out there...
2000 euro for a vintage guitar is pocket change, why should this boutique item be any different?
care to elaborate?
man, that thing better have real time thrusting action for 2000 pounds...
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:33 pm
by aqua_tek
doesnt really grab my attention
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:02 am
by thelike5
Yeah, it looks like it would tell you if you are lying or something...

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:50 am
by Machinate
The Phat Conductor wrote:Machinate wrote:It might be expensive and all, but it's also the most sophisticated step sequencing instrument out there...
2000 euro for a vintage guitar is pocket change, why should this boutique item be any different?
care to elaborate?
man, that thing better have real time thrusting action for 2000 pounds...
It's like a flattened Notron.. .don't you get it maaan, don't you see?
Seriously though, in order to answer this question I have to ask if you've ever tried doing a full track on an analogue-style step sequencer? Because that is just such a great feeling. And the immediacy of accessing all parts of the process by just reaching over, turning a knob or pressing a button is so cool.
- oh, and it's 2000 euro.
I simply love the 1-to-1 physical connection in step sequencing. Some people - Genoqs customers - swear by it.
I am right now in the process of phasing out my Schaltwerk, another hugely expensive unit @ 1200 euro. I love it to bits, but it's too bulky for my shows, unfortunately, which detracts quite a bit from it.
The only real alternatives on the market are 2x monomes or a Lemur - Both very very expensive solutions, yet they seem to have customers too.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:12 am
by simpleton
The Lemur is uber expensive but at least a quantum leap forward. This thing is trying to dazzle with that retro/sci-fi look, I'm not buyin' it.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:21 am
by stale bread
this thing is definitely dope, when it comes to music i don't even think the price matters if it's a piece that really does inspire you, , that said, i'd rather get two yamaha rs7000 and have somebody gut'em and put'em in a nice wooden mod.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:28 am
by Machinate
simpleton wrote:The Lemur is uber expensive but at least a quantum leap forward. This thing is trying to dazzle with that retro/sci-fi look, I'm not buyin' it.
Well if you are using a Lemur to design a step sequencer interface (which many many people are) then the only difference is tactile feedback and looks.
The GenoQs has the feedback, and many analog-synth freaks will love the wooden frame. I don't think it's ugly, but i sure as hell don't think it's pretty either.
but the sci-fi part of it... would that be the knobs and buttons? What would the unit be without knobs and buttons? And I must say that an x0x sequencer with 16x8 butttons has a tendency to look techie
And surely the faux-Star Trek look of the Lemur is more retro/sci-fi?
Not flaming here, simply trying to figure out just *why* people are dissing the unit.
Does it simply boil down to the high price?
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:49 am
by simpleton
Machinate wrote:And surely the faux-Star Trek look of the Lemur is more retro/sci-fi?
that's true it does have that early 60's look, and for the price it should also beam you up.
correction- the octopus is more like vintage/sci-fi. it would be cool to have onstage while wearing a purple cape
