Page 1 of 2
was 9/11 an inside job?
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:58 am
by The Phat Conductor
just curious... seems we've got a bit of a more uhm... 'open' demographic around here... so i just thought i'd test the waters.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:22 am
by Ozias Leduc
i've watched that "loose change" film.... let's just say i have an open mind, and i dont trust that christian fundamentalist fuck george bush. but i dont know enough yet.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:24 am
by The Phat Conductor
heyyy... this is the internets... stop being so reasonable!
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:50 am
by Spiralgroove
even if it was nobody will ever prove definitively prove it and noone will ever be held accountable
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:57 am
by jamester
I think it's so convoluted, probably only very very few people really know (or think they know) what happened. For me the bottom line is, there's more than enough evidence to show that things did NOT happen the way we were told to believe they were.
No surprise there, the government (any government) keeps secrets from its people. Sometimes truth will come out years down the road, sometimes never. That's life. Don't trust your government, so long as they're made up of human beings. Politicians no less!
This is why Americans are allowed to have guns, and even though I'm not a big gun guy, I understand.....
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:47 am
by The Phat Conductor
i'm really hoping that 'you're a fucking loser for posting this' will take the lead.
*fingers crossed.

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:01 am
by shaneblyth
let me be clear between the difference in the term inside and outside
Inside is like in the confines of a building or some other space
outside is out in the air with no confines
It was an outside job
How do I know ?
The planes where on the outside of the building NOT the inside..
OK got that.
Now to continue the theme. The planes where on the Outside.. and then came INside the building. Some was then inside and outside. Then the building fell down due to gravity so there was no Inside of the building anymore.
So it was an Outside then an Inside/Outside and then finally an outside job.. So most of the time it was an Outside job but momentarily it was both an inside and outside job.
Ok so choose which one you prefer and go Outside and play
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:07 am
by glu
shaneblyth wrote:
It was an outside job
How do I know ?
The planes where on the outside of the building NOT the inside..
Well that has been debated on a million page thread here some time ago.....
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:22 am
by shaneblyth
glu wrote:shaneblyth wrote:
It was an outside job
How do I know ?
The planes where on the outside of the building NOT the inside..
Well that has been debated on a million page thread here some time ago.....
wink.. My post has got to my most serious one of all time.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:32 am
by glu
shaneblyth wrote:glu wrote:shaneblyth wrote:
It was an outside job
How do I know ?
The planes where on the outside of the building NOT the inside..
Well that has been debated on a million page thread here some time ago.....
wink.. My post has got to my most serious one of all time.
oh just go find that thread and bump it for us!

haha
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:31 am
by stew
Ozias Leduc wrote:i've watched that "loose change" film....
Don't believe everything you see on the internet. Now go and watch the movies that dissect "loose change" and point out several flaws.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:54 am
by Tone Deft
stew wrote:Ozias Leduc wrote:i've watched that "loose change" film....
Don't believe everything you see on the internet. Now go and watch the movies that dissect "loose change" and point out several flaws.
Several flaws out of dozens of valid questions, big deal. Dismiss half that documentary and the whole 9/11 thing still stinks.
Sad part is, it doesn't matter. We could know the truth but it would never be acted upon. Look at the 9/11 report, Bush and others are war criminals but nothing will ever come of it.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:32 pm
by John Sweet
Until they explain Tower 7, they're guilty.
They'll never explain Tower 7, so end of story.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:00 pm
by The Phat Conductor
yea, i agree with the tower 7 statements above.
ignore everything else. it's not as important and there is too much room for debate. the tower 7 controversy is the piece of evidence we should be focusing on.
i think it's awesome that 'you're a fucking loser' is in the lead. it shows us just how effective the propaganda has been. nmobody wants to debate this anymore, and you can't say anything without becoming someone else's label and recieving the same stock arguments that you hear in the newspapers and tv.
chock up another victory for the new world order.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:09 pm
by Contra
tower 7 was the building that around 8 pm just "imploded" right?
pz.