Page 1 of 1
Multi core support process
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:55 pm
by Jon J Reese
Hi,
I have an HT P4. I can't select multi core support in Live, as it is grayed out.
What is the procedure to get Live to recognize the second processor so that I can activate this option?
Sorry if this has been asked before. I did a few searches but didn't come up with anything.
-J
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:09 pm
by Jon J Reese
I know other people out there are having/had this problem... I could use the help.
anyone?
P4 HT
windows xp
Live 6.0.5
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:49 pm
by sweetjesus
live doesnt use hyperthreading
when i had p4 with HT i found live performed better if i turned HT off at the BIOS level.
in the event of HT on a P4, it really makes most difference in terms of the OS itself and response time of switching between applications etc.
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:28 pm
by Jon J Reese
I'm aware of that issue.However,m I believe that was an issue with builds upto 5 only. Now with 6 and it support of multi core platforms it should support the HT, but it doesn't give me the option
Can anyone else shed a little light on this?
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:34 pm
by Jon J Reese
Someone has to know...
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:59 pm
by hoffman2k
Multicore and hyperthreading are 2 different things.
Multicore (multiple processors) are supported.
Hyperthreading isn't supported.
dual core - that is a cpu with two physical cores
hyper threading - that is one cpu with one core but acts to the operating system that it has two cores, multitasking based.
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:47 pm
by anti-banausic
hoffman2k wrote:Multicore and hyperthreading are 2 different things.
Multicore (multiple processors) are supported.
Hyperthreading isn't supported.
dual core - that is a cpu with two physical cores
hyper threading - that is one cpu with one core but acts to the operating system that it has two cores, multitasking based.
Exactly, I used to have a P4 3.2Ghz with hyperthreading. You are out of luck my friend. The engine in 6 supports multi-core, multi-processor, not hyperthreading.
Sorry.
Best,
Ab
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:09 am
by Jon J Reese
thanks guys... how is it that a 3.4 just doesn't cut it nowadays? this thing lasted all of a year.
Mac here I come...
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:25 pm
by anti-banausic
It's not that the chip doesn't cut it per se, but that it ran hot, and intel decided to invest its resources in putting two of the cooler running D cores on one chip. As far as clock speed, the core chips probably perform as well or better than the P4s at a lower clock speed, but the real boost is having two of them on one chip!!!
That is why your chip seems so dated, and due to the heat in the P4, I doubt we will ever see a dual P4 in a laptop for the same reason we never saw a G5.
Best,
AB
BTW, I went from a P4 3.2GHz to a Macbook c2d 2.0 GHz, the speed bump is intense!
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:33 pm
by Jon J Reese
anti-banausic wrote:It's not that the chip doesn't cut it per se, but that it ran hot, and intel decided to invest its resources in putting two of the cooler running D cores on one chip. As far as clock speed, the core chips probably perform as well or better than the P4s at a lower clock speed, but the real boost is having two of them on one chip!!!
That is why your chip seems so dated, and due to the heat in the P4, I doubt we will ever see a dual P4 in a laptop for the same reason we never saw a G5.
Best,
AB
BTW, I went from a P4 3.2GHz to a Macbook c2d 2.0 GHz, the speed bump is intense!
Thaks ofr that explanation.
The new mac laptop is what I'm going to pick up... Though it's hard to deny the desktop's sheer power.