Page 1 of 1

new audio engine

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:23 pm
by moomaaman
ok this would be the one issue that makes me buy live 7. I have used lite versions from version 4 but have always been unhappy with the audio engine.....
is there a noticable difference in 7 ? any long time users see an improvement?

Re: new audio engine

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:24 pm
by Pasha
moomaaman wrote:ok this would be the one issue that makes me buy live 7. I have used lite versions from version 4 but have always been unhappy with the audio engine.....
is there a noticable difference in 7 ? any long time users see an improvement?
Day & Night.

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:29 pm
by 90's child
Version 7's audio engine improvements have made me switch from Logic. Permantley.

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 6:36 pm
by moomaaman
90's child wrote:Version 7's audio engine improvements have made me switch from Logic. Permantley.
thats very interesting, its a choice between the two for me, I would rather stick with ableton than learn a new DAW.... the future music review was non-committal about the audio engine, so that was the answer I was hoping for..... any one else?

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:50 pm
by Tarekith
From something I posted on ALDJ:

Ok, here goes. I tested Live 7.1 versus Logic 8.0. As we are talking about overall sound quality and not timing issues (and not saying there are any), I ran the test using three audio loops all at the same tempo of 120 BPM. I also tried this test using projects that contained up to 10 audio loops, but the results were identical, so I'm going to discuss the 3 loops test in order to save my bandwidth, as I'm making all files available for DL:

http://tarekith.com/assets/Live7VsLogic8.zip

These are just random audio loops from my collection, I tried to pick loops that not only sounded decent together, but also demonstrated a lot of dynamics and frequency spread to make audible comparisons easier. All three loops are 24bit/44.1kHz wav files, and exactly 4 bars long at 120BPM. I placed each loop on it's own stereo audio track in both Live and Logic, and set the track faders to -6.0dBFS for all tracks in both apps. The following additional settings were used:

- Both apps latency set to 512 samples.
- Live 7 uses the equivalent of a 3dB pan law, so Logic was set to -3dB Compensated.
- Both projects set to 24bit/44.1kHz default.
- Files in Live were not warped, and did not have Fade on.

Here is the Live Project screenshot:

Image

Here is the Logic Project screenshot:

Image


At this point playback of both projects sounded identical to my ears, at numerous volume tests, using both Mackie HR824 speakers, and my Shure E3c and Sony MDR v700DJ headphones. So I next rendered (Live) and bounced (Logic) the projects down, in both cases choosing the output format to be 24bit/44.1kHz wav files, non-normalized, with no dither. These were then loaded into Logic 8 on seperate tracks, as you can see they look identical:

Image

Listening comparison once again made the two files sound 100% identical, having my wife randomly solo each track while listening through my Sony headphones with my back turned, I was unable to tell any difference in audio quality no matter which was solo'd.

HOWEVER...

As I started to get more scientific in my comparisons, I discovered that there WERE differences between the files. I flipped the phase of the Logic waveform and played the two files back simultaneously. This resulted in audible (err... or not) silence, I could not hear anything as the two files were cancelling. BUT, looking at the master meter in Logic, I could see that some signal was playing back, albeit VERY quietly. As you can see in the screen shot below, using the Inspector XL spectrum analyzer, there are some very low level differences in the files:

Image

It's important to look at the dB scale in the plug in before jumping to conclusions. In the main audible range of human hearing, the difference between the two signals is almost at -90dB, which is only 6dB above the absolute noise floor of your standard CD quality (i.e. 16bit) wav file. This is also below the dither level that would be in the file, had we applied any (and dither is almost always applied to the files you will hear in the real world). So, while there IS a difference between the renders of Live 7 and Logic 8 now, that difference is:

- For all intents inaudible, being well below the average music signal in todays music.
- Likely obscured by dither, had we applied any.
- Primarily in the low end of the audio spectrum, well below 250Hz, where the ear is least sensitive.

Anyway, the main conclusion I would draw based on these tests, is that there is no audible difference in sound quality between Live 7 and Logic 8, though they are not producing bit for bit identical copies. So, have fun arguing about the test I ran, I'm off to go pick up some friend at the airport, then snowboarding for a few days :)

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:54 am
by moomaaman
thanks tarekith thats very helpful.......

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:58 am
by Timur
Thanks Tarekith! :D

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:56 pm
by headquest
I'm still having the same problem with acoustic piano recording that I had with Live 6. Maybe somebody (Tarekith?) can advise...

Basically in Live 6 if I record my piano it sounds fine without any warping at all. However, whichever warp mode I select introduces bad artefacts even with very minor tempo changes. For example, if I record at 120bpm, then move the tempo to 122bpm, the piano track becomes unusable. Of the five options, "Beats" is least likely to artefact, no doubt because acoustic piano has strong transients to lock into. Alternatively, if I move a coupleof Warp Markers to correct timing, the same happens - unusable audio quality.

Now with Live 7 there seems to be a supreme irony: the higher resolution mix engine is emphasising the artefacts in the mix. As a result, Live 7 is actually sounding worse more quickly when I warp my acoustic piano recordings. To some extent this is also true with other audio recording, especially bass.

This is really frustrating. I have tried all the different warp modes, adjusted every provided setting... so far to no avail. Perhaps somebody can suggest a solution?

In terms of other hosts, I use Adobe Audition 3, which has the Radius timestretch. This seems to be far superior, and is usually able to provide the results I can use for simple tempo changes. Also working in that environment I would tend to correct timing issues by cutting, moving the transients, and stretching the clip to fill the gaps. This is highly successful.

The thing I LOVE about Ableton Live is the workflow, but I'm still really disappointed by the quality of the results. While the new audio engine is generally far superior to the previous Live 6, it is really frustrating that the timestretch issue/quality is so poor, because this is integral to the value of Live as a whole programme. :(

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:39 pm
by Able Danger
interesting

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 3:41 pm
by sweetjesus
cheers tarekith,

i do wonder however if stuff like this can affect stuff further down the chain.

say you have a whopping limiter after a pretty exposing compressor, these differences could have definitive impact on things such as the headroom