Request - Give 2 responsible members mod rights.

knotkranky · Post by **knotkranky** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:30 pm

Tone Deft wrote:
knotkranky wrote:I am honestly amazed on how well this forum self performs. Really, it's wonderful.

Or is it more like this;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbhRssQt ... re=related <--- Lord Of The Flies
does that make Timur Piggy?

Only if you want Timur to be maligned for weeks and then crushed by a giant boulder

Ya gotta admit, there is a bit of "Lord of the flies" here

TITBAG · Post by **TITBAG** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:38 pm

Tone Deft wrote:like I said, I can't right now, I'm at work and don't want to loose two jobs from rubbing one out at work.

it's lose not loose you ballsack

djadonis206 · Post by **djadonis206** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:41 pm

TITBAG wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:like I said, I can't right now, I'm at work and don't want to loose two jobs from rubbing one out at work.
it's lose not loose you ballsack

It's 'your' not 'you'

it's lose not loose your ballsack

and ball sack should be two words not one

titbag!

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:43 pm

knotkranky wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:
knotkranky wrote:I am honestly amazed on how well this forum self performs. Really, it's wonderful.

Or is it more like this;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbhRssQt ... re=related <--- Lord Of The Flies
does that make Timur Piggy?
Only if you want Timur to be maligned for weeks and then crushed by a giant boulder

Ya gotta admit, there is a bit of "Lord of the flies" here

depends on whether or not Timur returns his L7 box or not.

yeah Tit, I misspell that one often. you gonna correct ALL the spelling errors or just follow me around? that's pretty weak. let's consider my delivery versus your content.

dcease · Post by **dcease** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:51 pm

Tone Deft wrote: what if everyone used the Troll Blocker script and there were two divides on the forum, the twats like TitBag and his kind and the rest of 'us' (whoever that is) and each group blocked each other but existed on the same forum. to the outside observer it would look like mayhem, to the rest of us it would like we wanted it to.

best delivery yet so far. but i have no intentions of blocking anyone. good for you and your camp tho... you won't be bothered by idiots like b0unce, tit, or myself. how wonderful for you. i second b0unce... now.

TITBAG · Post by **TITBAG** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:53 pm

djadonis206 wrote:
TITBAG wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:like I said, I can't right now, I'm at work and don't want to loose two jobs from rubbing one out at work.
it's lose not loose you ballsack
It's 'your' not 'you'

it's lose not loose your ballsack

and ball sack should be two words not one

titbag!

wrong on all counts

'your' makes no sense in this context - did you stop frothing at the mouth long enough to actually read?

ballsack is one word

TITBAG · Post by **TITBAG** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:56 pm

Tone Deft wrote:
knotkranky wrote:
Tone Deft wrote: does that make Timur Piggy?
Only if you want Timur to be maligned for weeks and then crushed by a giant boulder

Ya gotta admit, there is a bit of "Lord of the flies" here
depends on whether or not Timur returns his L7 box or not.

yeah Tit, I misspell that one often. you gonna correct ALL the spelling errors or just follow me around? that's pretty weak. let's consider my delivery versus your content.

lets not. you are dreary, and that is simply unforgivable. now go block me, and miss out on all the fun that is coming up...this forum is not going to know what hit it...are you listening Herr Henke? ARE YOU?

djadonis206 · Post by **djadonis206** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:14 am

TITBAG wrote:
djadonis206 wrote:
TITBAG wrote: it's lose not loose you ballsack
It's 'your' not 'you'

it's lose not loose your ballsack

and ball sack should be two words not one

titbag!
wrong on all counts

'your' makes no sense in this context - did you stop frothing at the mouth long enough to actually read?

ballsack is one word

could be a cultural thing but I agree with you there titbag.

looking back on it I'm not sure how I missed that

cunt (I mean that in the way your people use the word)

xrayfish · Post by **xrayfish** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:24 am

TD has a big ballsack/ball sack (he must have, he's got big balls)

forge · Post by **forge** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:26 am

Poster wrote: i mean come on.. you instantly know it's a bot by thread title don't you?
just don't click it..

.

no this is the point here - it has stepped up a notch

remember that chris cowie thread on 'warping a track with relative success' ? It just got a reply from a bot which means if you get a 'topic reply notification' and click on it at work etc then it will come up without warning

If Ableton dont act on this soon then people will stop checking the forum from work

b0unce · Post by **b0unce** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:31 am

Cry us all a nice big river forge, you inbred nonce.

what kind of cunt has that 'how to warp a track' thread on topic reply notification anyways ?
A cunt I'd rather not endure while he's working, no doubt.

forge · Post by **forge** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:39 am

Tone Deft wrote: I have never once clicked on a pron post 'accidentally', most often it's curiosity of what's going on. anyone who gets tricked by those posts should probably be taken out of the gene pool.

again I'll re-iterate - normal existing threads with a lot of replies are starting to get replied to with pron spam - makes it a bit harder to make that decision...

b0unce · Post by **b0unce** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:41 am

i <3 re-iterating

b0unce wrote:Cry us all a nice big river forge, you inbred nonce.

what kind of cunt has that 'how to warp a track' thread on topic reply notification anyways ?
A cunt I'd rather not endure while he's working, no doubt.

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:42 am

forge wrote:
Tone Deft wrote: I have never once clicked on a pron post 'accidentally', most often it's curiosity of what's going on. anyone who gets tricked by those posts should probably be taken out of the gene pool.
again I'll re-iterate - normal existing threads with a lot of replies are starting to get replied to with pron spam - makes it a bit harder to make that decision...

that was so 6 hours ago!

interesting loophole in the forum, you truly deserve the post whore count title!

hopefully once someone is burned by that once they won't do it again, but still, you're right.

you're on like page 2, catching up?

truly pissy Monday thread.

forge · Post by **forge** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:54 am

Tone Deft wrote:
forge wrote:
Tone Deft wrote: I have never once clicked on a pron post 'accidentally', most often it's curiosity of what's going on. anyone who gets tricked by those posts should probably be taken out of the gene pool.
again I'll re-iterate - normal existing threads with a lot of replies are starting to get replied to with pron spam - makes it a bit harder to make that decision...
that was so 6 hours ago!

interesting loophole in the forum, you truly deserve the post whore count title!

hopefully once someone is burned by that once they won't do it again, but still, you're right.

you're on like page 2, catching up? truly pissy Monday thread.

yeah shit this has gained a few pages since then