Page 1 of 4
MORE MACROS, 8 IS NOT ENOUGH! - VOTE NOW
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:06 pm
by Debrecini
8 Macros is not enough to control a rack...
PLEASE ADD MORE.
Maybe double it to 16, but what I'd really like to see is a custom amount.
Add as many as you want.
Please hurry with this one, I imagine it wont be hard to do.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:14 am
by logman
I think Live shouldn't allow too much customisation of interface, so that people can share sets easily and perform other people's works LIVE. If additional macros get in the way of this idea, I'm against it.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:27 pm
by Debrecini
I really dont see how that would effect it, additional macros would always be a welcome addition.
Plus they could always cap the custom amount to standardise it a little
Most MIDI controlers have at least 16 controls, 8 rotaries & 8 sliders.
But some of us have more controls and would like to make more use out of them.
Sharing projects would still be just as easy, if not better!
Sorry but I really dont see your point.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:47 pm
by Angstrom
logman wrote:I think Live shouldn't allow too much customisation of interface, so that people can share sets easily and perform other people's works LIVE. If additional macros get in the way of this idea, I'm against it.
the interface is separate from the actual operation of the program so this makes no sense.
The interface IS currently customizable to a very small degree, colouring, size of panels, panels open, session or arrangement.
If I have a customized interface, I could still load any song, the interface customisation merely shows the data differently.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:15 pm
by The Producer
+1
I also dont see how it would effect sharing projects.
As in fact it would make it better giving you more controls to tweak.
There is not enough currently, if you have a few things in your rack then 8 macros gets used up in no time.
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:03 pm
by mr.ergonomics
+1
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:22 pm
by OriginalSpaceMan
I would like at least 64, but would prefer 1024.
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:06 am
by forge
+111111
please
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:33 pm
by darrelldiaz
+1
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:29 pm
by prebentious
+1
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:35 pm
by prebentious
+1
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:37 pm
by pstoaling
.................gone
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:46 pm
by Angstrom
pstoaling wrote:8 is more than enough I think. how about getting a MIDI controler with hardware macros if you really need that many..?
I think you don't really know what they are if you can say say something like that.
macros assign to parameters within racks, sub-chains, etc. Each macro has ranges and polarity which is specific to each sub parameter
hardware controllers have no way to store sub chain ranges and inversions for every single rack preset in every users library.
your suggestion is incorrect
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:49 pm
by pstoaling
...............gone
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 10:42 pm
by The_Super_Ape
Not just more, but the ability to use them to effect changes in rewire slaves is the main thing i find lacking in Live.