Page 1 of 4

Anyone using Apogee Duet?

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:02 am
by misteron
I've heard one report of problems using Duet with more than 2GB RAM (post #21 on this page)

Can anyone confirm / deny?

Has anyone used Duet with Leopard?

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:24 am
by joeyfivecents
using duet with leopard and the only problems I've had so far is the massive amounts of latency with Live.

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:15 pm
by joeyfivecents
any news on this?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:46 pm
by misteron
no news here.
decided on ultralite instead

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:42 pm
by t1mp
i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total. Its a very good card. I am using with 4 gigs of ram.

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:53 am
by joeyfivecents
i'm also running it with Leopard and 4 gigs of RAM but if I adjust it down past 11ms input latency it crackles and pops like crazy

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 3:03 am
by dysanfel
I use it with 3GB in my MacBook and 4GB in my Hackintosh. Works great. If you want a unit that sounds better than anything else on the market under $1500 buy a Duet.

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:31 am
by Tytus
t1mp wrote:i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total.
after delay compensation?

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:39 pm
by TheSilent
misteron wrote:no news here.
decided on ultralite instead
Decided on ultralite mk3 also..

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:55 pm
by beats me
Correct me if I am wrong here, but I heard you can't separate the main outs from the headphone out so it's all or nothing. How stupid…or maybe I am stupid if I'm wrong. It seems a little pricey if all you are getting is just clean sound and low latency on just 2 tracks.

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:25 pm
by joeyfivecents
there is clean sound but like I keep saying, with Live there is no low latency.

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:35 pm
by krank
Tytus wrote:
t1mp wrote:i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total.
after delay compensation?
Huh?

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:05 pm
by Tytus
im asking if he uses delay compensation at all. cause like joey said, theres no low latency with live.

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:55 am
by Tarekith
Delay compensation has nothing to do with this... so.... huh?

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:42 am
by t1mp
krank wrote:
Tytus wrote:
t1mp wrote:i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total.
after delay compensation?
Huh?
yes after delay comp