Ableton Forum

ewistrand/stjohn: tbh i think you are exceptions. but nevermind, everyone on his own.

glitchrock-buddha wrote:Fm8 is significantly lighter on CPU and I would say is also the nicer sounding of the two.

thats true, operator is very dirty and rough. you won´t really get sober hollywood pads with it.

yeah whatever, i don´t giving advices. you propably should just give a shit about it, doing on your stuff.

but imho thid world is full such shitty crap antimusic no one wants to really party anymore. there is no energy, no edges, no room, no travelling. no stories within the sound. its empty. and ...

the one is a big preset machine with cosmetic tuning (fm8),
8O ..
i'm not sure i would agree with that. :wink:


sure you have advanced mode and all the obvious hit, but who´s really using it? everyone just takes a preset and cuts something off, maybe changin the lfo rate and the osc volume ...

after listening to your other stuff i must cancel my opinion. this here is really good compared to that other (hell of a preset cellar). i hate me to write that but i want people to develop from bores to flowers and stuff. and sure i envy people like you, even getting finished and ppolished their ...

thats much a different, both machines.

the one is a big preset machine with cosmetic tuning (fm8), the other is more like a quick and compact adventure. you go inside and end somewhere totally different (operator). i do prefer operator (together with drumatic and sq8l my only software synth right ...

vocoder reminds me much of multiple filtered resonator instances, very live-associated sound.

and same here about looper. had gathered much more of my interest than those multiband (though i do appreciate a - hopefully neutral and not hyperdigitalizing - limiter) and groove things. BUT enough of ...

i don´t work much with return tracks inboard, at least not the way that i would need real control over it. people should get away, that everything has the total priority at the same time, and that a controller would be something like a 3 d abstract (of their ableton live) they could dive in and be ...

sorry but i´m way dissapointed. thought you´d make more original, deeper stuff. sure its ok, etc., but... don´t know. nevertheless congratulations.

usually i just give a short hint, saying its the best thing you can get for workflow. a friend of mine who always tried to encourage me doing music (r.i.p.) did all his stuff in cubase and reason for many years, but switched over to live (with a reason) within months after i just told him of that ...

thats (far ahead dfx) my favorite freeware programmer. lofi, drumatic 1-3 and retro verb are incredible quality.

if its possible then some kind of pipeline, to connect midi parameters. say: IF parameter "frequency" of "device 63" > 87 THEN parameter "osc1 level" of "device 02" = "vca level" of "device 08" x 0.075 x tempo. just bullshit example, but something like that. letting the devices dance with each other ...

One of the differences between Max and Reaktor is that you can add external objects like oscilators, filters, random number generators...So a big part of the Max community is people coding objects in C - maxobjects.com, whereas with Reaktor there is no way to add external objects.


bits of time ...

hell i couldn´t care less about platinum records of the last two decades, though i´d doubt it honestly. softare companies pay artists the same way hardware companies do, and sure they tried all the free copy and found a quick statement of euphoria for a few bucks.

its different to believe something ...

According to the beta information, you need to have a valid Live7 license in your account to be able to join the beta.


of course you do need the cracked authentification code. :roll:


sorry just kidding. as i told you, i´m not such asshole. and after fooger coming down a little bit yeah, maybe ...