That post of mine was not thought out on my part, and I would have deleted it if you and 3dot hadn't quoted it...beats me wrote:Obviously I see value in AA or I wouldn't be going but I do struggle with some of the intense attitudes with some people in the program, bordering on fanatical Scientology. Having problems with the program? Get audited/go to another meeting.Machinesworking wrote:Thanks, great way to end that thread.
3dot is a total idiot about addiction, knows absolutely nothing, but getting in a flame war with him is a waste of time, and undermines the honor of the thread.
I used to chair an AA meeting, for about 5 years, and there's not a single bit of doubt in my mind that 3dot currently is struggling with addiction, everything in his posts reads like denial. Seen it over and over again.
I was having somewhat of a text argument with my sponsor last night. I'm not drinking and not tempted to drink really and am fine with going to a meeting or two a week, but he wants me to go to 3 or 4 a week at all costs. That was after I put my foot down that I'm not doing the 30 in 30, honesty with myself and others. I see the program as something I should be involved with but if I am generally having an ok time with not drinking why force myself to spend so much time on the subject? I would definitely go more if/when I'm struggling with alcohol.
I'll put it an easy way on this forum. If you're really enjoying working on a song and alcohol is the furthest from your mind, why should you interrupt that to go an AA meeting?
I'm just saying it's this attitude that can scare people completely away from the program when even smaller doses could help them out on some level.
but your question is really very, very valid! AA sort of thinks it's the cats meow, without really having the statistics to back it up. All methods of quitting have almost exactly the same recidivism rate, 14% AA is a tool to use, the dogma is annoying at best, and potentially mentally damaging at worst. AA doesn't work any better than other methods, but the fact is human beings are social animals, we can of course use pure will power and sound mental thinking to keep from drinking at bars etc. but AA can provide a heavy drinker with a few friends of associates etc. who don't drink, thus making it easier to not feel isolated.
The AA meeting I chaired was an Atheist Agnostic one, I've never read the Big Book all the way through, never had a sponsor, and never did the 12 steps. I've been off drugs and booze for 11 years now. When I said "Take what you can and leave the rest!" I wasn't kidding. IMO the best way to stay sober is to ask yourself if what you're doing is going to drive you to, or away from sobriety. I was asked to join a metal band as the second guitar player 3 months after I quit and decided that I was taking a much worse chance of going back to drinking if I declined, knowing full well that all three of them drank like fish and smoked weed like dragons. 11 years later I was right, I'm certain 90% of the sponsors out there wouldn't have approved.
There is no 'way' to quit, there is no method that's 'better', not being a wreck on drugs is the goal, the rest is unimportant IMO. <-- that is why I was dogging on 3dot, because he thinks there is some method of choice that's the cure. The cure is the cure, I don't give a rats ass about the method. Far too many spiritual path seekers fail, far too many people spend far too much energy trying to moderate themselves to prove absolutely nothing IMO. My relatives mostly quit drinking on their own and have been successful at it, I have one friend who uses the church etc. in the end I have no right to judge the method.
Basically, you know what you need to do to stay sober, if you ever go back out, you chose to. It's that simple really. My personal take on it is that I need to keep that in mind, it's not at all about pure willpower or deferring to a higher power, it's about realizing that though the chemical aspect of addiction is definitely there, it's the psychological part that's the hardest to deal with.