http://www.musictechtutorials.com/deadm ... up-part-1/
Need to sell my house to have an setup like this......
the sound quality deteriorates if your performing an mp3-style track live that you may have made in ableton. if you were just playing the wav or the aiff then it might not deteriorate as much, but those files can be massive. you obviously have to compensate by adding more compressors and whatnot to re-beef up your tracks (atleast I do).rsaulo wrote:One of the things that I do not agree is when he say that
"You cannot play Live with the same quality if you playback your productions".
I thing the most "Production" effects can be performed live...
My point is more about the $$$$ on the setup, the Live set seems not so complicated to me, it's simply Djing IMHO, the "Live" channel he says, I have doubts if he uses "Live" so much....
![]()
![]()
I dont't think he's talking about MP3, in Live all is converted to WAV no?Bright Morningstar wrote: the sound quality deteriorates if your performing an mp3-style track live that you may have made in ableton. if you were just playing the wav or the aiff then it might not deteriorate as much, but those files can be massive. you obviously have to compensate by adding more compressors and whatnot to re-beef up your tracks (atleast I do).
deadmau5's skill with routing things into different places allows his technical sound to be so advanced which I think is his strength.
That's right. When playing live you don't have to sound like a record. IMHO.rsaulo wrote:If you see an rock band for example, never will sound live as how sounds in the studio, of course, but it's not a excuse to not play live in a show, this is my point. (of course, i don't know if the comparison is fair...![]()
)
That's my point.rosti wrote: That's right. When playing live you don't have to sound like a record. IMHO.