Even went to visit Bono.
The one near Vannes.

Of course. We will have to beat the Yankee bragger.leedsquietman wrote:Is this a competition ?
I saw Autechre in Lille last night so you all can kiss my ass.derzai wrote:Of course. We will have to beat the Yankee bragger.leedsquietman wrote:Is this a competition ?![]()
Mooi man. Ik wilde er ook naar toe, maar raakte de weg kwijt bij Brussel Halle Vilvoorde.dhilsabeck wrote:I saw Autechre in Lille last night so you all can kiss my ass.derzai wrote:Of course. We will have to beat the Yankee bragger.leedsquietman wrote:Is this a competition ?![]()
Geen probleem. Je hebt niet veel gemist...derzai wrote: Mooi man. Ik wilde er ook naar toe, maar raakte de weg kwijt bij Brussel Halle Vilvoorde.
(grapje).
LoopStationZebra wrote:funky shit wrote:Really tho the Russians would have eventually destroyed the Nazis.
You guys are KILLING me.![]()
The only reason the Russians were able to get their heads out of their own arses and actual cross into Germany was because.....um......lemme think....
Oh yeah. Because the US utterly and totally destroyed Germany's ability to make war. Oh and we also had them fighting on numerous fronts. And we'd cut off their entire supply of oil. Something like that.![]()
Weren't they having to pick up rifles off the ground from the waves of their comrades that died in front of them because there weren't enough to go round?David Glynn wrote:The Red army as it was called back then was the largest, most experienced, most advanced fighting force on the planet at the time. American troops were surprised at how technologically well equipped they were when they met in Berlin.
LoopStationZebra wrote:it's like a hipster commie pinko manifesto. Rambling. Angry. Nearly divorced from all reality; yet strangely compelling with a ring of truth.
They met at the river Elbe, about 100 kms outside of Berlin.David Glynn wrote: American troops were surprised at how technologically well equipped they were when they met in Berlin.
Here you go, a little bit down the page.leedsquietman wrote:where did this chart originate ?
I would like to see the basis for those numbers, which do not seem very accurate at first glance.