how to create loops from the floor up

conny · Post by **conny** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:39 am

Andreas: I experimented some more with your send mangler set and experienced a flash of joy when also including a send track with resonator pluged in, keeping at clean from resonators except the "tone" one - that could produce some nice bass and some freaky disharmonies.

// C

Machinate · Post by **Machinate** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:11 pm

Hi guys, I'm glad you enjoyed the template . Just wondering what kind of cpu usage you're getting? Iirc it was quite a hog.

Conny: yeah, adding resonators after the filters on the sends and tuning them in c, d#, g and Bflat for instance, for some frequency-dependant melody-triggering.

Again, the link is The SendMangler

conny · Post by **conny** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:02 pm

CPU joggles between 9 and 40 % for me.
(Ordinary laptop PC)
// C

AdamJay · Post by **AdamJay** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:44 pm

Machinate wrote:Hi guys, I'm glad you enjoyed the template . Just wondering what kind of cpu usage you're getting? Iirc it was quite a hog.

Andreas,

here on the 1.5ghz G4 Powerbook i made some alterations.
i changed the Autofilters from the Lo and Hi sends respectively to AUHipass and AULowpass, this way i get more frequency response (from 10hz to 22khz).

that being the only change, i never get above 17% cpu usage. and those are just quick peaks, its usually around 12-14% cpu.
this reminds me of a template i made a while back that was 5 bands with a couple of carefully placed supatrigga's

.. i seem to have misplaced it when i moved files off the PC tho

EDIT: correction, 16% peak, i had a suppatrigga on that i forgot to turn off.

noisetonepause · Post by **noisetonepause** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:57 pm

AdamJay wrote:LimeLite!

This thing is all over my new stuff... or rather, the old version which is in the user library. Its structure is a mess but it just sounds so nice. Lovely. The sequencer is rather limited, I think, and that it's just step on/off and not volumes, but I ain't complaining. Will adapt it to a CList sequencer at some point, probably.

-Paws

AdamJay · Post by **AdamJay** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:05 pm

noisetonepause wrote:
AdamJay wrote:LimeLite!
This thing is all over my new stuff... or rather, the old version which is in the user library. Its structure is a mess but it just sounds so nice. Lovely. The sequencer is rather limited, I think, and that it's just step on/off and not volumes, but I ain't complaining. Will adapt it to a CList sequencer at some point, probably.

-Paws

well there's step on and accented step on, so thats good.
and for the tie/pod sounds you can turn the "mod" assignment to decay on the more percussive sounds and i've found this gives you a workaround hack to volume on that sound.

i like it for just jamming. running it in standalone with audio hijack open with a tad bit of Apple reverb, Vintage Warmer, and a sprinkling of L2.
i've got a ton of jams here that i can just throw into a live set now.

drush · Post by **drush** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:10 pm

Machinate wrote:Hi guys, I'm glad you enjoyed the template . Just wondering what kind of cpu usage you're getting? Iirc it was quite a hog.]

just getting around to this.. mad! thanks again

it'll jump up to 19% for a split second but in general i'm getting 14-15% on a 1.47ghz G4

i've also been feeding hardware audio through it this morning.. reminds me of old kawai arps that if you let them run for a while would start spitting out really weird results. fuuun.

AdamJay · Post by **AdamJay** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:31 pm

drush wrote: i've also been feeding hardware audio through it this morning.. reminds me of old kawai arps that if you let them run for a while would start spitting out really weird results. fuuun.

i didn't own any kawai synths but once owned a Kawai Q80 and i was thinking how much the send mangler reminded me of its onboard Arppegiator. i think it had 30 or 35 styles that you could scroll through and messing with this .als gave me a total flash back of the Q80.

in the words of Keanu Reeves...

'whoah'

mishmashmole · Post by **mishmashmole** » Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:46 pm

Machinate: Superb mate. I will definitely use this for making new loops. This is genius stuff. thanks

Machinate · Post by **Machinate** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:41 am

You're *very* welcome!

A.

cyclyk · Post by **cyclyk** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:33 am

Machinate> thank you very much, great idea! I was doing something like this but yours is more clever. Thanx again.

Rahlo · Post by **Rahlo** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:43 pm

Machinate,

I appreciate you giving this away for free man. This joint is really incredible, and I can see using this extensively in creating the sounds for my next recording project!

Man. The last month and a half have been full of learning and revelation for me musically! Its' trippin me out.

Bernie Lomax · Post by **Bernie Lomax** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:47 pm

Machinate wrote:Right, guys...

The SendMangler

THIS IS SICK! Thanks!

Machinate · Post by **Machinate** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:46 pm

rahlo wrote:Machinate,

I appreciate you giving this away for free man. This joint is really incredible, and I can see using this extensively in creating the sounds for my next recording project!

Rahlo, the appreciation for this work is totally overwhelming for me. All I can say at this point is that something big is coming...

noisetonepause · Post by **noisetonepause** » Sat Apr 23, 2005 12:03 am

Andreas -

So... why's a smart guy like you studying communications?

how to create loops from the floor up

Re: how to create loops from the floor up

Re: how to create loops from the floor up