Notation in Live 9?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Post Reply
MPGK
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:57 am
Location: Hamburg

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by MPGK » Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:16 am

Whatever works for you, I guess... there are numerous solutions for PC or Mac though that don't require you to run an Atari emulator. ;)
I mean, nostalgia is great and stuff, just thinking about it makes me want to boot up the old 386DX again and load up that old Modplug Tracker... but really, come on.
I thought this thread was about people wanting to write notation in Live. And here you are, talking about using old Ataris that have an "oldschool groove". When you use quantization, it's all mindless algebra, whether you call it "intelligent" or not and whether you use twenty percent or a hundred.
Image
"17 years ago, MIDI sure sounded better!" :D

3phase
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:29 am
Contact:

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by 3phase » Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:57 am

why would one want to write notation in live? but when there are really people like that.. you can achive all what you want with an atari in much better ways than any notation editor in live will ever do... and even when this is not the case and live will get a super duper notation editor... it will need years to see that...

so realistically the atari is a very good midi plugin for live..beats it in all regards..

and that quantisation is not = quantisation is easy to get when you try it... with the notator you get much better results when quantizing.. it has the more inelligent algorythm and it quantizes mixed tracks with trioles and straight notes...

and the best thing.. on a mega st you can run the thing one year i a row without a single crash !! and 100% silent.

however..wait for your score editor aslong you wish..just wanted to show a cheap option to get the desired functionality
mac book 2,16 ghz 4(3)gb ram, Os 10.62, fireface 400,

EpikureeR
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:58 pm

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by EpikureeR » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:29 pm

Aren't there plenty of DAWs which support this?
I don't see the necessaty for this feature
EpikureeR

MPGK
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:57 am
Location: Hamburg

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by MPGK » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:48 pm

3phase wrote:why would one want to write notation in live? but when there are really people like that.. you can achive all what you want with an atari in much better ways than any notation editor in live will ever do... and even when this is not the case and live will get a super duper notation editor... it will need years to see that...

so realistically the atari is a very good midi plugin for live..beats it in all regards..

and that quantisation is not = quantisation is easy to get when you try it... with the notator you get much better results when quantizing.. it has the more inelligent algorythm and it quantizes mixed tracks with trioles and straight notes...

and the best thing.. on a mega st you can run the thing one year i a row without a single crash !! and 100% silent.

however..wait for your score editor aslong you wish..just wanted to show a cheap option to get the desired functionality
Okay, like I said, whatever works for you. I'll try it out before judging, it just seems complicated to run an emulator just for using a really aged notation program as a plug-in.
EpikureeR wrote:Aren't there plenty of DAWs which support this?
You're right about that, but I'd really like to see Live with notation. Cubase, Logic etc. lack many features - especially in handling - that Live provides.

I agree, there's more important things to do and features to implement. But it's good to let Ableton know there are users who'd profit from a simple notation feature.

3phase
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:29 am
Contact:

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by 3phase » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:29 pm

MPGK wrote:
3phase wrote:why would one want to write notation in live? but when there are really people like that.. you can achive all what you want with an atari in much better ways than any notation editor in live will ever do... and even when this is not the case and live will get a super duper notation editor... it will need years to see that...

so realistically the atari is a very good midi plugin for live..beats it in all regards..

and that quantisation is not = quantisation is easy to get when you try it... with the notator you get much better results when quantizing.. it has the more inelligent algorythm and it quantizes mixed tracks with trioles and straight notes...

and the best thing.. on a mega st you can run the thing one year i a row without a single crash !! and 100% silent.

however..wait for your score editor aslong you wish..just wanted to show a cheap option to get the desired functionality
Okay, like I said, whatever works for you. I'll try it out before judging, it just seems complicated to run an emulator just for using a really aged notation program as a plug-in.
EpikureeR wrote:Aren't there plenty of DAWs which support this?
You're right about that, but I'd really like to see Live with notation. Cubase, Logic etc. lack many features - especially in handling - that Live provides.

I agree, there's more important things to do and features to implement. But it's good to let Ableton know there are users who'd profit from a simple notation feature.

the emulator just for print software from the atari.. to print scores..

to use the program with full midi functionality you need an old atari mega st with monochrome monitor.. the dongel.. best in form of the unitor smpte interface ..the prog disk..and very important because more rare than the other stuff, the handbook..

this all was state of the art studio ware of the late 80´s ..the software alone was twice as expensive as the live suite...

its still a pretty comrehensiv midi sequencer on its own.. and well can be used to compose midi files that you than can prerecord in live.. with a score editor...

thats the cheap way.. or you buy logic and export midi files... or cubase.. but notator/ logic allways had a better name for the score editor...

so.. when you are in hurry you need to try one of the alternatives.. its not likely that L9 will have a score editor..

at least i think that they need to get the surround ability and multitrack workflow enhancements that make other daw´s big..first.. and L9 is anyway not around the corner in the moment
mac book 2,16 ghz 4(3)gb ram, Os 10.62, fireface 400,

MPGK
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:57 am
Location: Hamburg

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by MPGK » Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:03 pm

3phase wrote:the emulator just for print software from the atari.. to print scores..

to use the program with full midi functionality you need an old atari mega st with monochrome monitor.. the dongel.. best in form of the unitor smpte interface ..the prog disk..and very important because more rare than the other stuff, the handbook..

this all was state of the art studio ware of the late 80´s ..the software alone was twice as expensive as the live suite...

its still a pretty comrehensiv midi sequencer on its own.. and well can be used to compose midi files that you than can prerecord in live.. with a score editor...

thats the cheap way.. or you buy logic and export midi files... or cubase.. but notator/ logic allways had a better name for the score editor...

so.. when you are in hurry you need to try one of the alternatives.. its not likely that L9 will have a score editor..

at least i think that they need to get the surround ability and multitrack workflow enhancements that make other daw´s big..first.. and L9 is anyway not around the corner in the moment
Alright - but like stated in this thread before, there are lots of free notation programs that can export MIDI files, and that's the way I do it at the moment when I feel limited by Live's MIDI editor. No need to buy or emulate an Atari for that, let alone just for printing out sheets. And if I wanted professional state-of-the-art notation for publishing or printing purposes (notice the alliteration), I wouldn't buy Logic or Cubase just for that, I'd buy a designated program like Sibelius or Finale, which are industry standards.

Surround ability - meh, I for one don't need surround. Live is live, and that means Mono in most of the cases. Sure, would be nice to have it, but not many people will use it, not for studio recording either. Better buy two to three good speakers and do a good mix that anyone can listen to than buy five to six crappy ones and mix for some people sitting in their home theater.
As for "multitrack workflow enhancements" - whatever you mean by that - my workflow is getting better and better, especially when it comes to quickly capturing an idea before it fades away, and that's the crucial part of making a record. And my workflow wouldn't be so good if it weren't for Live's session/arrangement interaction. Sure, there's always room for improvement, but Ableton did a good job (re-)inventing this way to deal with the great art of music recording.

3phase
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:29 am
Contact:

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by 3phase » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:34 am

MPGK wrote: And if I wanted professional state-of-the-art notation for publishing or printing purposes (notice the alliteration), I wouldn't buy Logic or Cubase just for that, I'd buy a designated program like Sibelius or Finale, which are industry standards.


As for "multitrack workflow enhancements" - whatever you mean by that - my workflow is getting better and better, especially when it comes to quickly capturing an idea before it fades away, and that's the crucial part of making a record. And my workflow wouldn't be so good if it weren't for Live's session/arrangement interaction. Sure, there's always room for improvement, but Ableton did a good job (re-)inventing this way to deal with the great art of music recording.

ok, when money is no issue an atari is certainly pointless..

but what you mean with session arrange interaction?

i allways have problems with live when it comes to multitrack recordings because you cant apply changes to mutiple clips at once...like moving the start marker 10 ms... you have to go to arrange and record there and do lots of cuting and zooming arround.. and copying that back to session.. with is a really annoying process.. compared to protollos where you have all the key commands to such things in lightspeed... but also without keycommands its much quicker in applying micro edits or building loops with multiple tracks..

Problem is.. LIve is the Session view for me..everything else you have better in other daw´s..

so how you deal with multitrack operations from session view?

and if there are no tricks i ve overseen...wouldnt that be a great workflow enhancement to be able to deal with 16 single clips as if the would be one?

and on the output side..there are lots of other things you can do with more output busses than just surround..

but ok.. same as with your score thing.. i can go to other software when i need that and rewire life

however.. how to deal with multitrack recordings where clips belong to each other on the time line but you want them as seperated files is a main week point in live where some improovements can have big impact on the workflow and creative possebilitys.. session view is not really able to deal with the timeline..

you dont even get any solid information when you ant to do it on 16 tracks by hand..
as soon you zoom in you only apply edits optically..tht maybe works on drum tracks.. but on a vocal with long parts of silence? you easily destroy the source performance.. and have to rebuild it..

its actually a pain to work with multitrack recordings in session view.. and not very comfortaple in arrange...

a major pain in the ass..

when i ve missed some hidden functionality there please tell me.. but if not thats the place for DAW improovement..
mac book 2,16 ghz 4(3)gb ram, Os 10.62, fireface 400,

MPGK
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:57 am
Location: Hamburg

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by MPGK » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:41 am

3phase wrote:
MPGK wrote: And if I wanted professional state-of-the-art notation for publishing or printing purposes (notice the alliteration), I wouldn't buy Logic or Cubase just for that, I'd buy a designated program like Sibelius or Finale, which are industry standards.


As for "multitrack workflow enhancements" - whatever you mean by that - my workflow is getting better and better, especially when it comes to quickly capturing an idea before it fades away, and that's the crucial part of making a record. And my workflow wouldn't be so good if it weren't for Live's session/arrangement interaction. Sure, there's always room for improvement, but Ableton did a good job (re-)inventing this way to deal with the great art of music recording.

ok, when money is no issue an atari is certainly pointless..
It's not about money here, although you were the one who suggested to buy Cubase or Logic just for the notation feature, which are both more expensive than Finale. If you have no money, download a free program which is fine for almost every purpose. If you need a professional tool because you're a professional arrangement/publishing person, you should have or at least spend the money on an industry standard, and not one from 20 years ago. Plain and simple.
but what you mean with session arrange interaction?
Okay, I see this highly depends on how you use Live. I for one use the session view only for two things: to gather ideas and to perform live.
Here's how my work looks like for the electrorock duo:
I have an idea and I put it in a clip. I start the clip and I get another idea. I make another clip. I apply no mixing at this point, only necessary things like low- and high-cuts as well as volume adjustment. When I think I'm ready, I move over to arrangement view. From there, I begin to construct a song, and that's where I draw my automations, put on FX, and all that stuff. When I'm unsure, I move back to the session view to gather ideas. The song is ready, I do the mix.
To get the song to a live format, I bounce every track we won't manipulate live, and put the different parts of the song into clips and scenes.
And that works good so far.
i allways have problems with live when it comes to multitrack recordings because you cant apply changes to mutiple clips at once...like moving the start marker 10 ms... you have to go to arrange and record there and do lots of cuting and zooming arround.. and copying that back to session.. with is a really annoying process.. compared to protollos where you have all the key commands to such things in lightspeed... but also without keycommands its much quicker in applying micro edits or building loops with multiple tracks..
Why would you need to go to session view to move the start marker of a clip? I agree, you can't do that with multiple clips at once without workarounds, but what would be the point in that anyway...? If you have a set of tracks that are always lagging behind, set the track delay to +10.00 ms, and if you have a clip that starts too late, just open the clip and move the start marker. :?
and if there are no tricks i ve overseen...wouldnt that be a great workflow enhancement to be able to deal with 16 single clips as if the would be one?
Depends on what you mean with "deal with".
and on the output side..there are lots of other things you can do with more output busses than just surround..
Okay, I'll give you that!
however.. how to deal with multitrack recordings where clips belong to each other on the time line but you want them as seperated files is a main week point in live where some improovements can have big impact on the workflow and creative possebilitys.. session view is not really able to deal with the timeline..

you dont even get any solid information when you ant to do it on 16 tracks by hand..
as soon you zoom in you only apply edits optically..tht maybe works on drum tracks.. but on a vocal with long parts of silence? you easily destroy the source performance.. and have to rebuild it..

its actually a pain to work with multitrack recordings in session view.. and not very comfortaple in arrange...
Now I see what you mean and I get what you're saying. In my opinion, session view is not the place to do vocal recording, if not even audio recording at all.
There are also some things I miss in arrangement view, like a good way to do dubbing, and this could very well be more important than notation, but as a whole, Live works for me. Audio recording just takes a tad longer than in Logic - opposed to that, being creative is a lot easier and faster in Live! And that's why the choice is clear for me.

3phase
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:29 am
Contact:

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by 3phase » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:35 pm

you are a real smart ass.. session view is everything in live..

and when you want to record multiple go´s with different musicans,
single patterns that act as independend reels are perfect for that..when you than can do edits on that, and combine the sessions via scene launches you actually have a comfort that is much higher than the comping in logic..

however ... if live would be a super program one wouldnt have so many wishes with it..or?

and regarding your 20 years old studio standards... thats one of the most stupid things i ve heard on the very rich ableton forum..

pro studios are filled with even older gear..and a good stusdiostandard is even after 20 years still better than a modern half developed products..

what we easily can see if we compare midi functionality and abilitys of ableton live or protools with the 20 years old studio standard notator on the very solid working and noise free atari computer...
Last edited by 3phase on Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mac book 2,16 ghz 4(3)gb ram, Os 10.62, fireface 400,

MPGK
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:57 am
Location: Hamburg

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by MPGK » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:57 pm

You're obviously not willing to discuss in a neutral manner... again. (nor willing to make an effort to hit the right keys while typing)
when you want to record multipls goes wit different musicans single patterns that act as independedn reals are perfect for that..when you than can do edits on that realy and combine the sessions via scene launches you actually have a comfort that is much higher than the comping in logic..
Even if I would humor you and try to decipher this, I just couldn't do it.
and regarding your 20 years old studio standards... thats one of the most stupid things i ve heard on the very rich ableton forum..

pro studios are filled with even older gear..and a good stusdiostandard is even after 20 years still better than a modern half developed products..

what we easily can see if we compare midi functionality and abilitys of ableton live or protools with the 20 years old studio standard notator on the very solid working and noise free atari computer...
You do get we're not talking about vintage audio equipment here, but about a notation program? I don't have any problems with running notation software on my Mac. I don't need an Atari for that. Heck, I wouldn't even know where to put an Atari in this room. That's the part where money becomes an issue. I didn't say anything but "For me, that'd be way too complicated, I'd rather use today's pro software if I want SysEx that bad."
Go on and use your Atari. Früher war alles besser, right? Sorry, but I can't help but picture you as a frustrated techno guy who had his heyday in the early 90's, one that now spends much of his time on a forum ranting about software and technology everyone uses there and how music nowadays is just noise. And did you feel the same way about some guy 20 years ago? Maybe, just maybe, you just didn't catch the last train to the present. My deepest condolencies if that's the case.

3phase
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:29 am
Contact:

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by 3phase » Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:21 pm

MPGK wrote:
You do get we're not talking about vintage audio equipment here, but about a notation program? I don't have any problems with running notation software on my Mac. I don't need an Atari for that. Heck, I wouldn't even know where to put an Atari in this room. That's the part where money becomes an issue. I didn't say anything but "For me, that'd be way too complicated, I'd rather use today's pro software if I want SysEx that bad."
Go on and use your Atari. Früher war alles besser, right? Sorry, but I can't help but picture you as a frustrated techno guy who had his heyday in the early 90's, one that now spends much of his time on a forum ranting about software and technology everyone uses there and how music nowadays is just noise. And did you feel the same way about some guy 20 years ago? Maybe, just maybe, you just didn't catch the last train to the present. My deepest condolencies if that's the case.

you are just another of theese SAE boys without much clue..are´nt you?
And giving idiots good and cheap tips that suddenly turn out to be wanna be pros that are too good to touch crappy old computers but whine when a techno tool dont has a score editor?

no man..thats rather funny..in a disgusting way.. present? pff.. your present is way to behind for my taste...


and now do me a favor.. put some tabasco on your finger..and plug yourself.
mac book 2,16 ghz 4(3)gb ram, Os 10.62, fireface 400,

MPGK
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:57 am
Location: Hamburg

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by MPGK » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:38 pm

3phase wrote:
MPGK wrote:
You do get we're not talking about vintage audio equipment here, but about a notation program? I don't have any problems with running notation software on my Mac. I don't need an Atari for that. Heck, I wouldn't even know where to put an Atari in this room. That's the part where money becomes an issue. I didn't say anything but "For me, that'd be way too complicated, I'd rather use today's pro software if I want SysEx that bad."
Go on and use your Atari. Früher war alles besser, right? Sorry, but I can't help but picture you as a frustrated techno guy who had his heyday in the early 90's, one that now spends much of his time on a forum ranting about software and technology everyone uses there and how music nowadays is just noise. And did you feel the same way about some guy 20 years ago? Maybe, just maybe, you just didn't catch the last train to the present. My deepest condolencies if that's the case.

you are just another of theese SAE boys without much clue..are´nt you?
And giving idiots good and cheap tips that suddenly turn out to be wanna be pros that are too good to touch crappy old computers but whine when a techno tool dont has a score editor?

no man..thats rather funny..in a disgusting way.. present? pff.. your present is way to behind for my taste...


and now do me a favor.. put some tabasco on your finger..and plug yourself.
Woah, did I strike another nerve there? Sor-ry. As we can see, you're the one that gets butthurt over everything just because somebody disagrees with you. And you're running out of arguments, so you resort to personal offense without any connection to the case whatsoever.
Live is not a special "techno tool" anymore, it's a DAW. You fail to notice that.
And nope, no SAE. I'm no self-proclaimed audio technician or "producer". I'm a studied musician who likes to record his stuff. No more, no less.

Piplodocus
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by Piplodocus » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:32 pm

I'm a score reader, but I'd rather Ableton implemented things that made live make better or more interesting/exciting/varied music first, or allows me to trigger things, or pull off things live, like be able to intelligently follow tempo from a live drummer with MIDI trigger on his bass drum. For me live is for making studio music and MOSTLY to pull off certain music "LIVE" in a way other DAWS can't.

So, nice as it would be, I'd far rather it improved as a performance or creation tool, rather than as a desktop publishing tool. Obviously this has the caveat that you could write music onto the stave (easier for many reads to some extent), but normally I'm playing stuff in so it could show up as as pictures of cartoon characters as far as I care during input! In terms of editing parts with multiple notes at once and bursts of triplets etc on off-beats and the like, IMHO they're easier to see to edit in the pinao roll since notation doesn't have "rests" on every note that's not playing, and markers of where every beat is that's quickly changable between triplets and not, etc. That's why most classical players scribble all over the score with pencils to highlight and accent important things!

If I really needed to have notation then I'd export MIDI files, and throw them into something else. Someone mentioned that the MIDI parts may not export in the format they'd like for the notation software they're going to be imported into. Well I'd rather Ableton worked on more configurable MIDI Import/export then.

So yeah, it'd be nice, but for me Ableton has always grown out of a performance and sound shaping tool, so ANY new features are welcome, but it wouldn't make my tunes any better. I'd also like a visualiser so I can listen back to my lastest work whilst viewing squirly rhythmical images (rather than staring at the coloured boxes going by, but that's not near the top of my list either, and I'd probably use it more, and could send it to a projector when playing live!
Live relevant things: Suite 12, MacBook M1 Max, RME UFX II (kext drivers), Push 1

crumhorn
Posts: 2503
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by crumhorn » Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:38 am

I was originally against the idea of traditional notation in live, but having just watched this video of The Bays and The Heritage Orchestra --> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY54PDPEvvc I've completely changed my mind.

About 2 minutes in they show what they are doing with Sibelius.

Amazing concept.

They're playing WOMAD festival next week, so I'll get a chance to see how well it works in practice.
"The banjo is the perfect instrument for the antisocial."

(Allow me to plug my guitar scale visualiser thingy - www.fretlearner.com)

timwright
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Notation in Live 9?

Post by timwright » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:25 pm

crumhorn wrote:I would hate to see Live go that way. Traditional music notation is not rich enough for electronically produced music. If you are writing musical parts for band members then Live is not really the right tool IMO. The combination of piano roll and clip envelopes is a better form of "notation" for the kind of things Live excels at.
I agree with that. Live isn't exclusively for electronic music, of course not, but it's where it's strengths lie. I wouldn't expect Sibelius are frequently asked to implement glitch plugins and such.

Post Reply