RENDER TO Wonderfulness! - Live 4 is heaven!

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Riff Valley
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:03 am

Post by Riff Valley » Fri May 20, 2005 9:49 am

Does anyone actually understand the rendering process and what factors change the sound. Could it be the Windows Media Player (or whatever you use) that is influencing the sound.

::mic-minimal::
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 8:32 am
Location: behind you

Post by ::mic-minimal:: » Fri May 20, 2005 10:13 am

I render all the time, 16bit and 24it, have no problem with either, I also have silver spikes tape it but it has now become a pain and is much easier to just render, like i said never any problems. my setup is a panasonic laptop centrino and an amd desktop both get the job done right.
for the love of Live

forge
Posts: 17422
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Queensland, AU
Contact:

Post by forge » Fri May 20, 2005 10:42 am

I think live sounds better when you cover one eye and stand on one leg howling at the window.

Or maybe that's just when you take the blue pill.

Note to self: Red pill next time

smutek
Posts: 4490
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:30 pm
Location: Baltimore,United States

Post by smutek » Fri May 20, 2005 11:59 am

forge wrote:I think live sounds better when you cover one eye and stand on one leg howling at the window.

Or maybe that's just when you take the blue pill.

Note to self: Red pill next time
:)

Thanks for the early morning smile forge.

(here on the other side of the world)

forge
Posts: 17422
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Queensland, AU
Contact:

Post by forge » Fri May 20, 2005 12:30 pm

smutek wrote:
forge wrote:I think live sounds better when you cover one eye and stand on one leg howling at the window.

Or maybe that's just when you take the blue pill.

Note to self: Red pill next time
:)

Thanks for the early morning smile forge.

(here on the other side of the world)
no worries, it's late at night here. LATE at night - in spirit rather than by the clock. Damn this Austalian Hemp.

tomperson
Posts: 1018
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:55 am
Location: MVD, Uruguay, South America
Contact:

Post by tomperson » Fri May 20, 2005 1:50 pm

Hmmmmm. Why would the ASIO driver latency and such would make any difference when rendering to disk? I almost swear I could even do a render to disk in a machine without soundcard at all! Moreso, several times I've rendered stuff that was having glitches when played due to overload, and the render was just fine.

Whats that ASIO "compression" thing???
Turn up the radio. Turn up the tape machine. Look into the sunset up ahead. Roll the windows down for a better taste of the cool desert wind. Ah yes. This is what it's all about. Total control now.

Sales Dude McBoob
Posts: 2844
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Durham, NC. USA
Contact:

Post by Sales Dude McBoob » Fri May 20, 2005 2:49 pm

From what I gather, the ASIO compression issue is what brought about the demand for such products as the Dangerous Audio 8 Bus.

The problem is that when you play a song back in its host application be it Pro Tools or whatever as a multitrack file it sounds a certian way- but when you ask your computer to take the 30 or so tracks and do all of the math to sum those 30 tracks down to 2 track stereo for rendering, the song loses some of the life and playfulness it had going as a multitrack session.

But I gotta say, once again, I got my rendering in Live to sound really sweet last night so maybe it's more of a Pro Tools issue. :wink:

mikemc
Posts: 5464
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Post by mikemc » Fri May 20, 2005 5:19 pm

I render all the time, 16bit and 24it, have no problem with either, I also have silver spikes tape it but it has now become a pain and is much easier to just render, like i said never any problems. my setup is a panasonic laptop centrino and an amd desktop both get the job done right.
Tapeit has some gain control that it applies, this is likely what I'm preferring, and I prefer standing on my right leg while howling at the window, as opposed to the left, where I've got some sciatica.
:lol:
UTENZIL a tool... of the muse.

gomi
Posts: 1133
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: earth

Re: ..

Post by gomi » Fri May 20, 2005 5:55 pm

raapie wrote:I noticed Live sounds better when you turn your computer upside down.
with apples motion sensor you could totally control stuff!
yah!

jiggle that baby

wungawungawoowoo

shtreimel
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am

Post by shtreimel » Fri May 20, 2005 6:35 pm

Benshik wrote:
shtreimel wrote:Wrote, recorded and mixed and entire score for a major documentary film (to be released in Canada Fall '05) only using Live. That's it, that's all....zip. No other software was used. The only comments from the NFB (National Film Board of Canada) that my partner and I received was: "Excellent music".
Hi shtreimel
you say no other software was used for the ENTIRE score? How did you sync the music with the picture, as Live doesnt have video capabilities?
Or was it some tune that that guys in NFB tagged theirselves to the edit? In this case, they often re-process...

Cheers

Ben
Played the movie in Cubase on a separate computer...but in the end, we could've used quicktime to do the same. All the musical elements were done in Ableton.

Robert Henke
Posts: 1193
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 10:38 am
Location: Berlin

Post by Robert Henke » Fri May 20, 2005 8:31 pm

Okay, here comes the secret science behind render.

Usually a realtime audio application is calculating everthing it needs to calculate for processing one single sample which is then sent to the soundcard, then it waits till it needs to calculate the next sample and so on. If it needs only half of the time between two samples to calculate everything, your CPU load is 50%. If you try to calculate more then you can handle before the soundcard wants the next sample you`ll get a problem. Some applications do the same but with blocks of samples, say 64 samples at once. But the basic idea is the same. When rendering, the computer does not need to wait for the soundcard, and instead of waiting it starts calculating the next sample immideateley after it finished the current one. As you see, there is no difference in sound quality, because the soundcard or the file does not even know how much time the computer spends with waiting...

But:

The internal processing is done with 32 or 64 bit. The soundfile has 16 or 24 bit. If you have a sound file and you put the fader almost all the way down the file internally still has a good resolution, but if you record/render it with 16bit you will maybe end up using ony 12 bit and this is definitly audible. Also internally there is no upper limit for headroom ( well _almost_ no limit), but if you record/render a file with +6dB peak you will get ugly clipping.

Normalise:

If normalise is turned on, Live does two passes: In the first pass it runs thru the whole file and is looking for the maximum peak. If this is -6.32 dB, then it stores this value.
In a second step it raises the master volume slider internally by 6.32dB before rendering. Now you will get a file where the maximum is at 0.0dB.
After the rendering, the Master Volume is restetted to it`s previous value.

Consolidate does the same trick and this is why the clip volume slider ist allways at -xxx after consolidate.
This ensures that the consolidated file has the best possible resolution on disk.

Hope this helps a bit.

Robert

drush
Posts: 1282
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 4:40 am
Location: Venice, CA
Contact:

Post by drush » Fri May 20, 2005 8:36 pm

thank you Robert!

MrSleep
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:45 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by MrSleep » Sat May 21, 2005 5:05 am

Hay Robert..., is it true that.., you and the other guy, (I forget his name), go through the threads and have a lough about some of the silly posts being made in a fancy hotel with lots of beutiful lapdancers and booz??? :lol:

montrealbreaks
Posts: 995
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 11:38 pm
Location: Montreal Canada

Post by montrealbreaks » Sat May 21, 2005 6:18 am

MrSleep wrote:Hay Robert..., is it true that.., you and the other guy, (I forget his name), go through the threads and have a lough about some of the silly posts being made in a fancy hotel with lots of beutiful lapdancers and booz??? :lol:
Cool. I want to help. Hey Robert, does Ableton wanna start up a Montreal office?

I have changed my username; Now posting as:


M. Bréqs

bitmap
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 7:31 pm
Location: portland. OR
Contact:

Post by bitmap » Sat May 21, 2005 7:43 am

all of my renders sound great... not complaints here.
but then again, I am also on a mac.
15" powerbook G4 1.25ghz.
http://dustbreeding.com
http://www.unrecnow.com
___________________________
macbook|monome 128/64|kmxmini

Post Reply