3phase wrote:http://soundcloud.com/3phase/seduction
I gotta admit, I'm kinda diggin' that track.
3phase wrote:http://soundcloud.com/3phase/seduction
don't ever dare to think you know my motives, Tone. i'm not the sort of person to needlessly tear into people's work, i have never done so on this or any other forumTone Deft wrote:I'd rather the forum not turn into a place where people attack each other's creative output. let's just not go there. regardless of what he might post it's the easiest thing in the world to tear someone's music down.macmurphy wrote:do you have any current stuff we could hear, 3phase?
i'm genuinely interested.
+1The Leveller wrote:Jus' popping back to the OP topic.
I do see that plenty of 'pros' use a loop or two in their productions quite often. For example a nice little hi hat riddim which they layer under other stuff as part of their overall beat. i don't think there is anything too wrong with that
+1But to make a whole track from loops is obviously lame
mattadms wrote:Just like with everything else, the real fun isnt just using loops but chopping them up and creating something new out of them, and in that case it doesnt really count whether its a field-recording of your old grandma hitting some snares at 10bpm or PrimeLoops.
That goes without saying, and that has never been the premise for this/these discussion(s); also, I am absolutely certain that nobody around here makes whole tracks from these loop packs. The whole debate revolves around a single poster's fervent opposition to the very concept of loops.The Leveller wrote: But to make a whole track from loops is obviously lame
sporkles wrote:That goes without saying, and that has never been the premise for this/these discussion(s); also, I am absolutely certain that nobody around here makes whole tracks from these loop packs. The whole debate revolves around a single poster's fervent opposition to the very concept of loops.The Leveller wrote: But to make a whole track from loops is obviously lame