Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
-
oblique strategies
- Posts: 3606
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Another Green World
Post
by oblique strategies » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:38 am
innerstatejt wrote:Although this isn't what you want to hear, it really does make sense to get a hardware compressor to go between the dj mixer and soundcard. For an inexpensive one, I really like the Alesis nano compressor. You can probably find one cheap on ebay.
Actually, I'm fine hearing your suggestion. My asking about using my Aphex Dominator Model 720 Limiter is what started this part of the post going.
I also have a FMR RNC compressor that I can use, but I thought just limiting the peaks & turning up the overall signal would be better than compressing the signal. Your thoughts?
-
innerstatejt
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 10:43 pm
- Location: Denver, Co
-
Contact:
Post
by innerstatejt » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:38 am
Limiting isn't necessarily a bad idea just as long as you aren't over squashing your transients. I prefer a soft compression at a 3:1 ratio or so with threshold around -10db and doing my best to keep the peaks no higher than -3db. Ideally, the compressor would be used as a safeguard and not as a way to crank the volume higher than you would if you didn't have compression, unless you are going for a specific compressed sound.
-
3dot...
- Posts: 9996
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:10 pm
Post
by 3dot... » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:23 pm
might be good for acoustic sources.. not conversions..
I don't consider 3:1 at -10db ' soft compression'..
even assuming it peaks at -6db..
the envelope will alter the louder parts while not touching the softer..
certainly not wanted for simply recording into digital..
record with no dynamics altering...normalize.
..then compress using a high percision software comp..
(preferably with an automatic envelope and resampling)
-
oblique strategies
- Posts: 3606
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Another Green World
Post
by oblique strategies » Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:06 pm
Many thanks for all who offered advice. It is much appreciated. I will try a few methods & see what works best for a given source.
I haven't digitized tapes in a long time, & I'm looking forward to eventually having all my old music & sounds available.
-
fishmonkey
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:50 am
Post
by fishmonkey » Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:06 am
3dot... wrote:
record with no dynamics altering...normalize.
..then compress using a high percision software comp..
(preferably with an automatic envelope and resampling)
exactly.
if you've got a ton of digitizing to do, it makes no sense to digitize a processed version, especially since the digitizing is the time consuming part.
digitize first, process later. it also means you can try different things and batch process on your computer.