Sorry but I definitely make a distinction between playing a musical instrument and arranging audio files and triggering pre-written midi sequences on the fly. I don't see one as creatively superior to the other but I do see a distinction. In effect the way most performers of sample based and midi based music operate is like a composer rather than a musician. He is telling his machines what to play, when, and how. A musician is merely playing one melodic instrument in a given range of notes.
These two products have their own individual strengths. I can only assume that you and a couple other people on this forum must be shills for NI or just straight up trolling for the simple fact that you deny that Push could possibly have any advantage over Maschine on any front, for any customer looking for any specific thing. It seems you are being completely disingenuous or at least un-objective.
Do you really mean to tell me that there is no conceivable reason that an informed consumer would buy a Push rather than a Maschine? What if they want a higher range of immediately accessible notes while retaining portability? Do you really suggest that they buy a keyboard to plug into Maschine and carry that along with them? What if they don't want to mess with midi porting and just want to get down to business with Live? Would you really suggest that Maschine is just as plug and play as Push? Seriously.
They are two different things and one cannot replace all the functionality of the other. To state so is plainly disingenuous and insulting to the intelligence of everyone you address.