3dot... wrote:trevox wrote:
An interesting watch! I kinda sit on the fence with the whole argument and just use whatever I feel I can trust these days. I have said in the past that Live seems a bit "deader" than say Logic and whether it is perception rather than reality is up for debate. I'm not really arsed debating any more - I choose what I use and get on with it. Some of the stuff shown in that video was ridiculous!
Interestingly, I started using the Waves NLS plugins and while I did not notice the difference with the NLS plugin on a single track (I did similar tests as in the video with my eyes closed and guessed wrong a lot), I did tests where I sent 8 tracks summed in an NLS bus and the same 8 tracks with no NLS plugins and I really did notice the difference - or at least when I opened my eyes, I had guessed right which one I was listening to every time! Even though these plugins are incredibly subtle, I find all tracks sitting better in the mix even before I start doing any serious EQing, dynamics etc. Is it my imagination? Well I did the blind test thing and the fact I got it right pretty much every time gives me confidence in the fact it does actually make a difference for the better!
love NLS..
but..first.. contrary to belief.. NLS does not do actual summing
only emulates the gain stage freq response for many different channels + the master bus sampled off some famous desks..
adding that layer (only a taste really) of analog nonlinearity voodoo
second.. I agree with Sage.. it's not really a good comparison..
NLS is meant to make you sound closer to outside the box.. the OP wants a comparison for DAW sound.. which is not meant to color..
basically he's talking about the "engine" that handles volume.. panning timing ...latency and summing (adding)..
(and now I understand.. we're comparing stock fx plugins too?)
the whole shebang
third.. when you did the blind test.. did you remember to set the gains to be exactly the same in both subjects?
because the way we perceive (even slight) volume boost can give us the illusion that something sounds "better".. when actually it's slightly louder..
fourth..what is your monitoring environment like? do you think it's adequate to perceive the difference between "better"/"worse" "DAW sound"?
is anyone really equipped to answer that question..
the best I've seen so far is graphs comparing sample rate conversion between DAW
and I've seen me some DAW comparisons.. and participated in elaborate blind tests
maybe a better term would be Logic vs. Live "DAW character"?
but then.. why aren't we throwing ProTools Cubendo Reaper Studio One etc. into the comparison?
if you ask me .. once again..
it's all about personal workflow.. the rest is hype..
most of the elements in this ting aren't really comparable.. and if they are...
then the differences are marginal at best..