live.dial step size?
live.dial step size?
Hello,
lets say I have a live dial with the Range 20. 20000. and a step size of 1
If I now move it with the mouse it increments as expected by 1.
If I however tweak a know on Push it no longer increments by 1.
Is there a workaround to get fine tuning on Push working either ?
Since Push' Knobs are Encoders it should be possible, no?
Cheers
AnSolas
lets say I have a live dial with the Range 20. 20000. and a step size of 1
If I now move it with the mouse it increments as expected by 1.
If I however tweak a know on Push it no longer increments by 1.
Is there a workaround to get fine tuning on Push working either ?
Since Push' Knobs are Encoders it should be possible, no?
Cheers
AnSolas
Re: live.dial step size?
Don't own Push but I guess its encoders deliver midi CC values ? (0-127)
Aboard from V. 1
MBP M1 Pro 2021 - 16 Go RAM - Monterey 12.6.3
MBP 2.5 Ghz I7 16 Go SSD OSX 10.14
iPad + Mira+ TouchOsc
RME FF UC Live 11.3.21 M4L Max 8
Band : https://elastocat.org/
Madlab sound unit / objects, guitar, electronics / end_of_transmission
MBP M1 Pro 2021 - 16 Go RAM - Monterey 12.6.3
MBP 2.5 Ghz I7 16 Go SSD OSX 10.14
iPad + Mira+ TouchOsc
RME FF UC Live 11.3.21 M4L Max 8
Band : https://elastocat.org/
Madlab sound unit / objects, guitar, electronics / end_of_transmission
Re: live.dial step size?
I don't think so. It has Encoders not Potis, so it should just in/decrement data by sending an offset,madlab wrote: I guess its encoders deliver midi CC values ? (0-127)
eg +1 -1
-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: live.dial step size?
no I try...stringtapper wrote:Did you try setting the step size to 19980?
why ?
-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: live.dial step size?
Actually it's not called "step size" but just "Steps" in the Inspector.
And the reason is that 19980 should force the dial to increment by single integers between 20. and 20000.
And the reason is that 19980 should force the dial to increment by single integers between 20. and 20000.
Unsound Designer
Re: live.dial step size?
Anyways, it still jumps form 20 straight to 176stringtapper wrote:Actually it's not called "step size" but just "Steps" in the Inspector.
And the reason is that 19980 should force the dial to increment by single integers between 20. and 20000.
-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: live.dial step size?
I don't have a Push to test this. Can you make a [ctlin] object and monitor the output with a number box to see what the knob is sending?
Unsound Designer
Re: live.dial step size?
Like this?stringtapper wrote:I don't have a Push to test this. Can you make a [ctlin] object and monitor the output with a number box to see what the knob is sending?
http://screencast.com/t/Ala7A72S95b0
I just turn the encoders clock and counter clock wise.
Looks like it just sends ~1 and ~127 depending on the tweaking speed?
-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: live.dial step size?
Hmm yes, now that I think about it I have run into similar problems with encoders sending values like that. I will have to go back through some patches with my controller at home to see if I ever found a solution to that.
Unsound Designer
Re: live.dial step size?
Thank you very much for your time !stringtapper wrote:Hmm yes, now that I think about it I have run into similar problems with encoders sending values like that. I will have to go back through some patches with my controller at home to see if I ever found a solution to that.
-
- Posts: 6314
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: live.dial step size?
Well the encoders on the APC40 seem to be sending incremental values just fine. I think it might have been my Axiom controller that was giving me similar jumpy results. I'll dig it out and check.
Unsound Designer
Re: live.dial step size?
The encoders on the Push are sending out float values. I've found this to be extremely annoying while patching. I haven't found a good solution yet either. However, you might try a [scale] to translate the values of 0.-127. But that didn't work for me because I wanted to "see" the value on the Push (not 0-127).