King Peter - who said fusion is over?

Share your tracks with other users.
Post Reply
yorick2300
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:47 pm
Location: Reading, UK

King Peter - who said fusion is over?

Post by yorick2300 » Sat May 17, 2014 11:47 am

Hello, Ableton community. I've posted a new track online. I hope you like it. I've been listening to a lot of Weather Report and Return to Forever recently, and I'm trying to capture a little bit of the 70s fusion vibe. Any suggestions for improvement will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

https://soundcloud.com/yorick23/king-peter

doghouse
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:30 pm

Re: King Peter - who said fusion is over?

Post by doghouse » Sat May 17, 2014 1:25 pm

I'm a big fan of fusion. As a bassist, most of what I record at home falls somewhere in the black hole between the trip-hop/fusion/space rock genres.

I like the top part of your track, the bottom not so much. As a bassist (again) I found the bass line overly simple and monotonous...not grooving! Certainly something Weather Report never had problems with :wink: Working up some bass ostinatos and less sparse percussion would really open up the track.

Also, I'd trim the intro. That's a mistake I almost always make, place a long spacey intro into a track and 90% of the time it ends up being deleted from the final mix. The point is to get the listener's ear hooked early than 90 seconds into the track!

yorick2300
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:47 pm
Location: Reading, UK

Re: King Peter - who said fusion is over?

Post by yorick2300 » Sat May 17, 2014 3:17 pm

Thank you! I've always struggled with bass lines. I thought I'd done a reasonably good job of keeping it varied, but I guess this is something that I need to continue working on. As somebody with zero musical education, I have no idea what ostinatos are. :) Off to Wikipedia I go ...

I agree with your comment regarding the intro. I had it there as a placeholder while I tried to figure out how to start the track, but it got kind of stuck there.

Thanks again!

Post Reply