Live doesn't ditherPasha wrote:So you would not trust Live rendering?Michael-SW wrote:Yep. Of course going to higher sample rates like 88.2 or even 192 will mostly likely improve your sound quality, but the single best improvement with the least effort (CPU and disk space wise) is going to 24 bits bit depth.Pasha wrote: So you're suggesting 44khz at 24bit?
- Best
- Pasha
Note that when you finally go to 16 bits for CD burning (the absolute last step you should do) you'll need a decent bit depth convesion algorithm that supports dithering. Any decent sound editor should support that, probably even Audacity, which is free.
Which Sample Rate bit Depth is best?
-
rbmonosylabik
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:27 am
-
massiveheadpain
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:44 pm
- Contact:
-
Michael-SW
- Posts: 2054
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:05 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Re: Which Sample Rate bit Depth is best?
use 32bit floatpoint only for production. Downsampling/Dithering should only be done at the very end after mastering!
Re: Which Sample Rate bit Depth is best?
Woah!!!!!!!!!!
Now THAT is a neckrobump!!!
Now THAT is a neckrobump!!!
