Anbody using live 5 with UAD-1 ?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Post Reply
cane creek
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:20 am
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Contact:

Anbody using live 5 with UAD-1 ?

Post by cane creek » Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:34 pm

My UAD-1 plugins are using alot of CPU in live 5 when there not supposed to.

Example i use a NI FM7 and hit 1 Key and my CPU is 3% , if i add a Plate 140 reverb to the FM7 my CPU jumps to 13%. :oops:

i should only be getting about a 4% CPU hit for the plugins GUI load and i/o load

Anybody else noticing this :?:
Last edited by cane creek on Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[url=http://www.cane%20creek.co.uk]canecreek.co.uk[/url]

amo
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:30 am
Location: Paris/France
Contact:

Post by amo » Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:38 pm

So you sorted out your cracks etc.... how ? It may be interesting for others :wink:

Cheers, (I don't own a UAD-1, sorry)
amo
Live 5.0.3 - IBM Thinkpad R51 1.5ghz Centrino - 1,5 Go RAM - 7200 RPM 2nd HDD intern - RME Multiface - Windows XP Pro SP2

cane creek
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:20 am
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Contact:

Post by cane creek » Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:47 pm

Im still getting crackles Amo... :cry:
[url=http://www.cane%20creek.co.uk]canecreek.co.uk[/url]

Gigatron
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:22 pm

Post by Gigatron » Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:25 am

I have no problems with my aud-1.. takes about 1% per plugin for me.

funk313
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 10:40 pm
Location: Planet Rock

Post by funk313 » Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:07 am

yeah me 2! dont have the plate tho (wish i had damn its nice). dreamverb makes
it jump 13% and nigels like 25%. dont know if this is ableton or UADs fault.
have u tried to work with uad on other applications? and if so how is the cpu jump there.?

cane creek
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:20 am
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Contact:

Post by cane creek » Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:04 am

funk313 wrote:yeah me 2! dont have the plate tho (wish i had damn its nice). dreamverb makes
it jump 13% and nigels like 25%. dont know if this is ableton or UADs fault.
have u tried to work with uad on other applications? and if so how is the cpu jump there.?
I use the UAD-1 in cubase sx3 and it works flawless , so this looks like it may be an Ableton issue.
[url=http://www.cane%20creek.co.uk]canecreek.co.uk[/url]

cane creek
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:20 am
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Contact:

Post by cane creek » Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:06 am

cane creek wrote:
funk313 wrote:yeah me 2! dont have the plate tho (wish i had damn its nice). dreamverb makes
it jump 13% and nigels like 25%. dont know if this is ableton or UADs fault.
have u tried to work with uad on other applications? and if so how is the cpu jump there.?
I use the UAD-1 in cubase sx3 and it works flawless , so this looks like it may be an Ableton issue.
PS the plate 140 is well worth the money , its my Goto reverb nowadays... :D
[url=http://www.cane%20creek.co.uk]canecreek.co.uk[/url]

Alex
Posts: 4006
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 1:07 pm
Location: Ableton Headquarter

Post by Alex » Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:12 am

Hi cane creek,

does it make a difference when you change the plug-in buffer size?

regards,
Alex

cane creek
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:20 am
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Contact:

Post by cane creek » Fri Jul 29, 2005 11:08 am

changed my soundcards buffer size from 512 to 256 and now im only getting a 1% CPU hit when adding a PLATE 140.
1% Hit is normal for UAD-1 plugins.

Played 1 key on the FM7 got a 4% CPU hit then added 3 PLate 140's and only got a 6% hit :D
[url=http://www.cane%20creek.co.uk]canecreek.co.uk[/url]

Gigatron
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:22 pm

Post by Gigatron » Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:54 am

Yeah, try playing around with the plugin buffer sizes. I have mine set at "As Audio Buffer". Like I said, I only use up 1% per plugin.. even if your using reverb you shouldn't be going past 1-2% cpu as the whole point of the uad-1 is to offload processing. hehe

muthafunka
Posts: 2251
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 5:28 pm
Location: Tokyo

Post by muthafunka » Wed Sep 07, 2005 3:53 pm

So all seems fine in uad-1 land now? Been taking a good look at the Studio Pak and def. getting a slight moistening at the corners of the mouth!

cane creek
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:20 am
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Contact:

Post by cane creek » Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:58 pm

muthafunka wrote:So all seems fine in uad-1 land now? Been taking a good look at the Studio Pak and def. getting a slight moistening at the corners of the mouth!
Go ULTRA-PAK because i can promise you'll end up buying the other plugins and will save money in the longrun.

i live in the uk but bought one of my UAD-1's from the USA and saved alot of money , i got it from JRRshop , Jrrshop is a very popular shop for UAD-1 users.
Heres the UAD-1 FORUM
[url=http://www.cane%20creek.co.uk]canecreek.co.uk[/url]

muthafunka
Posts: 2251
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 5:28 pm
Location: Tokyo

Post by muthafunka » Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:40 am

Thaks cane creek, I'll have a look for sure. If you get a second card you can run all the plugs from the first card on the second too, correct? ie If you got an UltraPak then a ProjectPak you'd essentiallyy have 2 Ultra Paks ??

cane creek
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:20 am
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Contact:

Post by cane creek » Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:45 am

yes thats correct you can run all the plugin's on both cards , its quite clever as your PC/mac just see's the 2 cards as 1 Big card.
[url=http://www.cane%20creek.co.uk]canecreek.co.uk[/url]

Post Reply