


So. Can we please get some relevant updates to Live??
John
studiojohnny wrote:Look, even Deadmau5 agrees with me. And tweeted it to all 3.6 million of his followers.
Wow. Very well put. That original tweet is not surprising though. Some people are known for being negative and whiny. I guess if I had 50,000 outputs I'd be a little confused too. The "pro" musicians who complain all the time are probably the ones who got Live for free too just because they are who they are. Meanwhile, I paid full price for my copy and am happy as hell that I get to make music on a computer. The entitled generation- gotta love it.Stromkraft wrote:studiojohnny wrote:Look, even Deadmau5 agrees with me. And tweeted it to all 3.6 million of his followers.
So? The real question is whether he suggested it to Ableton and made a suggestion for people to vote on.
The widespread inclination to whine instead of to act in these forums is depressing. Stop being crybabies and sharpen your arguments, put forward ideas and indicate kindly yet clearly what you need and why to Ableton. Because even if you're in the echo chamber of your choosing now you're still in a tiny minority of Ableton users. If a majority wants Push to the be in the centre of development, how are you going to counter that? Not that Push users wouldn't benefit from a better Live. They would.
Granted, discussions like this one can be beneficial if ideas can be collected, refined and communicated. Quite commonly, whining — or something akin to that — just goes on and on and on here. Sometimes understandably so, because some missing aspects of what really should be implemented already is indeed missing.
I do understand the need, But it doesn't lead to much, except handling personal disgruntlement, allowing for venting and feeling unfairly treated. Are you going to settle for that? That's your campaign strategy for the features you believe in?
Naming inputs and outputs would be nice, but do I need it to make music? Nope.
Here's a few suggestions I found fitting this request:
Put your vote where your wishes are.
It would get my vote.pencilrocket wrote:
- SUG-????: Not allow Ableton to add emotes touch bar like Apple did to their new Macbook Pro.
come on man... this voting stuff seems more like an illusion of democracy. when it gets to the point of seeing petitions appear on "change.org" (lol...) on issues that have been voted on for years and that remain completelyStromkraft wrote:studiojohnny wrote:Look, even Deadmau5 agrees with me. And tweeted it to all 3.6 million of his followers.
So? The real question is whether he suggested it to Ableton and made a suggestion for people to vote on.
The widespread inclination to whine instead of to act in these forums is depressing. Stop being crybabies and sharpen your arguments, put forward ideas and indicate kindly yet clearly what you need and why to Ableton. Because even if you're in the echo chamber of your choosing now you're still in a tiny minority of Ableton users. If a majority wants Push to the be in the centre of development, how are you going to counter that? Not that Push users wouldn't benefit from a better Live. They would.
Granted, discussions like this one can be beneficial if ideas can be collected, refined and communicated. Quite commonly, whining — or something akin to that — just goes on and on and on here. Sometimes understandably so, because some missing aspects of what really should be implemented already is indeed missing.
I do understand the need, But it doesn't lead to much, except handling personal disgruntlement, allowing for venting and feeling unfairly treated. Are you going to settle for that? That's your campaign strategy for the features you believe in?
Naming inputs and outputs would be nice, but do I need it to make music? Nope.
Here's a few suggestions I found fitting this request:
Put your vote where your wishes are.
Uh, so it helps validate our concerns when one of the biggest names in the industry publicly agrees. This is not some tiny, insignificant minority.Stromkraft wrote:So?studiojohnny wrote:Look, even Deadmau5 agrees with me. And tweeted it to all 3.6 million of his followers.
yes, I found this argument to be very weak so I told you. I do think you have other great arguments though.studiojohnny wrote:Uh, so it helps validate our concerns when one of the biggest names in the industry publicly agrees. This is not some tiny, insignificant minority.Stromkraft wrote:So?studiojohnny wrote:Look, even Deadmau5 agrees with me. And tweeted it to all 3.6 million of his followers.
All we're asking for is relevant updates here.
Ableton is like a car company that keeps announcing a redesigned cup holder when the car has engine problems. Enough with the damn cup holders already.
Also, one of the primary functions of forums since like the Roman empire has been to have a place to debate and exchange ideas, which is exactly what we're doing here, so I'm not sure why you're (rather ironically) complaining about people airing their complaints. This is an Ableton forum, is it not?
Also, this thread was all from last year.ian_halsall wrote:well if Deadlouse most important issue is "name outputs" I don't really know what to say other than "idgaf"
he's a very talented musician though - that can't be denied