The PURE SAW-project

[nennmichwieduwillst]

Believe it not, hold it as a "conspiracy-theory" but the SAME one-cycle SAWS samples sounds in different sampler/synths... lot of difference. Especially the PURE ONE_CYCLE SWAS in NI products like kontakt, massive, all reaktor sampler/tables.... sounds (i would say) "weak".
And Simpler/Sampler pure-one-cycle-SAWS sounds also for my ears "cheap/weak". The "Analog" PURE-SAW sounds in my opinion/ears much better!
As said the PURE SAW with all fx/modulation/filter... off!
Yeah, i also cant really believe it... but just HEAR PURE SAW-sounds with same Level-envelopes (just sustain to 1 and all other to zero) and compare with fresh ears... thats a "subtil-huge" difference!

If you use longer samples than ONE_CYCLE, of course each sampler-algoritm wiill transpose/re-pitch/formant-shift.... of its own koop-settings and its other mathematically way. But i believe we all reaktor, kontakt, simpler/smampler... user will get "better" sounds if we have different samples from all the machines or vsti... I guess 1 second should be enough, to find the reiht rigt loop-pints... as shorter looped, as NOT much more pitch-artefacts will be appear as "secondory problem"... The goal is that ONE PURE 1-second SAW-smaple sounds better than the ONE_CCLE waves by read-algoritm from NI, ableton....simplre/sampler(kontakt.......
The ANALOG PURE SAW sounds much better, than the same PURE Roland/Oberheim... real Analog wave....?
As said the ONE_CYCLE smapler/Synth wave will ONE_Cycle in Simpler,... believe it or not...., How sounds a PURE serum saw, how sounds a XY_plug, how sounds a REAL PURE HW.... Of course this will mostly not be "significant" for consumer-ears in party-party-mood (IF partys are in future ever never allowed, because we have a lethal influenza with a special name.... party-people/church-members.... will suddenly die... But tax-payers, work-slaves can work in smallest rooms/cars.... , the VIRUS make a big long-way from tax-payers...., but anyway, believe your morning/evening-full-contact-propaganda.... deactivate your brain, keep brave and and all-believing slave... )
However: PLEASE post YOUR favorite PURE!!!!! Saw in C-1 here. I uess 1 second should be enough! Of course there will be "formant/pitch" artefactsbut it sounds other "artifacted" then a WEAK Saw!
I would open this place, with some Interssting SAWS. but i dont know how to attach in this forum an appendix????? Please tell me everyone how to do!

[[jur]]

I don't see why you have to mention "conspiracy", no point in here.
On your topic, it's not clear what you're talking about. Are you referring to specific samples? Where are they from? Are are saying that no matter what your 1-cycle-long sample is, it's sounding different in different samplers?
Sorry, I tried to read your post entirely, but I failed to as it's a bit "rough".

[yur2die4]

I don't see why you have to mention "conspiracy", no point in here.
On your topic, it's not clear what you're talking about. Are you referring to specific samples? Where are they from? Are are saying that no matter what your 1-cycle-long sample is, it's sounding different in different samplers?
Sorry, I tried to read your post entirely, but I failed to as it's a bit "rough".

He is saying he’d like a thread dedicated to raw saw waveforms with no effects at C-1. And he’d like for there to be an audible collection of 1 second examples so we can compare and contrast.

[nennmichwieduwillst]

He is saying he’d like a thread dedicated to raw saw waveforms with no effects at C-1. And he’d like for there to be an audible collection of 1 second examples so we can compare and contrast.

Ecxactly tjats my point. Thank you.

[[jur]]

You could use a Google Drive or something like that as a place to store and share your saws. I'm pretty sure it's possible to set it so that it's easy for everyone to add theirs to the library.