Intel gear is around the corner
-
hellospiral
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:14 pm
Intel gear is around the corner
Here we are:
http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0512briefly.html
Mac people will probably be faster on Ableton?
http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0512briefly.html
Mac people will probably be faster on Ableton?
-
Ambioun - Techno Man
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:58 am
hmm, hard to tell on that.
But, I wouldn't bet on a long wait for a dual core myself. The internal date is supposed to bemid Januaryfor MacIntel powerbooks too.
Yonah is available in 2 types : dual core and single core.
I am guessing the new ibooks will be single to make the best use of battery life and lower power consumption.
But the powerbooks will most likely be dualcore as the power-users are obviously expecting a degree more oomph and will accept a trade off on battery.
As for waiting for Ableton to code a native version, I wonder if your Live OSX-PPC version through Roseta will actually run faster on a Yonah than Live OSX on an old G4.
I am guessing that Live5 will be faster through Rosetta on a macintel Powerbook than on an old g4 powerbook !
Why? because Live has no Altivec to translate, it's all pretty platform independent. This is one time I think that you Mac users will be glad of that, very glad.
lets see if I'm right and we see a dualcore yonah macintel in early feb running Live 5 faster than a g4 powerbook! Then we can all start bugging them to optimise for dual core

But, I wouldn't bet on a long wait for a dual core myself. The internal date is supposed to bemid Januaryfor MacIntel powerbooks too.
Yonah is available in 2 types : dual core and single core.
I am guessing the new ibooks will be single to make the best use of battery life and lower power consumption.
But the powerbooks will most likely be dualcore as the power-users are obviously expecting a degree more oomph and will accept a trade off on battery.
As for waiting for Ableton to code a native version, I wonder if your Live OSX-PPC version through Roseta will actually run faster on a Yonah than Live OSX on an old G4.
I am guessing that Live5 will be faster through Rosetta on a macintel Powerbook than on an old g4 powerbook !
Why? because Live has no Altivec to translate, it's all pretty platform independent. This is one time I think that you Mac users will be glad of that, very glad.
lets see if I'm right and we see a dualcore yonah macintel in early feb running Live 5 faster than a g4 powerbook! Then we can all start bugging them to optimise for dual core
Breqs, I'm with you all the way. Not to start a processor war, but I'll take the minor Windows headaches (which are fairly minor with XP when you turn off the unnecessary Bill Gates crap) and have the options of faster and cheaper machines any day. I used to love Macs, but at some point, the value of PCs really won me over.
Not to say Apple isn't inventive and creative, but what really pisses me off are business practices like selling people an iPod where you can't exchange the battery yourself. What the shit is that?
Not to say Apple isn't inventive and creative, but what really pisses me off are business practices like selling people an iPod where you can't exchange the battery yourself. What the shit is that?
Rumor has it that the new mac intel machines won't have firewire support. Could be a deal-breaker....
-
Johnisfaster
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
Agreed - that would be a 100% deal breaker. I just bought an Ozonic!sqook wrote:Rumor has it that the new mac intel machines won't have firewire support. Could be a deal-breaker....
Probably nonsense, they're most likely going to drop the slower FW400 support and go FW800 all the way. Why have 2 different FW chipsets on a logic board when the faster is backward compatible?sqook wrote:Rumor has it that the new mac intel machines won't have firewire support. Could be a deal-breaker....
i will happily eat crow if that is the case; i really i hope it is. however i work next to an apple office (not store) and i very seriously doubt if we'll see powerbooks near that fast.Angstrom wrote:hmm, hard to tell on that.
But, I wouldn't bet on a long wait for a dual core myself. The internal date is supposed to bemid Januaryfor MacIntel powerbooks too.