Live 3 - OSX performance and optimization

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
noisetonepause
Posts: 4938
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:38 pm
Location: Sticks and stones

Post by noisetonepause » Tue Sep 02, 2003 2:27 pm

I certainly find it faster than OS9. And more enjoyable. And prettier :)

Can't wait till people start implementing some of the REALLY fucking cool features of Cocoa/Objective C programming :twisted:

-Paws

jamm

Post by jamm » Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:43 pm

Is OSX is faster than 9.2?

On my powerbook book g4/500 i run OSX and 9.2
and i do not see a big difference in speed.
I mostly still use 9.2 because it "feels" faster.
I think this is because of the 8 mb videocard.
Everytime apple promises a faster OS(panther) but what they
forget to say is you need a bigger and faster computer(mac)
to run it on. I am glad i can still use my 9.2 system.
Do do don,t believe the hype.

Greetinz....Jamm

php
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 1:39 am
Location: Connecticut, USA

Post by php » Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:47 am

Well since Live 3 won't be AltiVec optimized, then using OS 10.3 Panther might provide a significant performance boost alternative instead.
Here are some posts from an OS 10.3 developer about the greatly improved performance of Panther including much more efficient Core Audio:

http://www.pstheme.com/cgi-bin/think/ik ... f=15;t=918

Here's a quote from the Think Secret site:

"do you have any impression about how panther performance is on older machines, late G3/early G4?

I've tested Panther 7B28 on my G4/500 AGP with an Rage 128 Pro and now a 8500 (QE on). It is much faster, even non QE Macs will see a way noticeable difference; I should say especially non-QE Macs. My initial post on this thread explains why. Every Mac will see a major boost because of the code enhancements made to the system. As an example, on a 1GHz Mac, OS 10.3's iTunes playback now takes less than 1% of the CPU! OS X's improvements mean that every one of your Mac Apps will have a lot more processor time to themselves. For App that dynamically link to the public frameworks, they will notice an even greater performance boost."

jamm

Post by jamm » Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:26 pm

Man, make this a new topic, if this is true it is VERY good news!! :)

Greetinz..

Alex Reynolds
Posts: 989
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 5:48 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Contact:

Post by Alex Reynolds » Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:57 am

By and large the vibe is that the speed jump between 10.1 and 10.2 is noticeably larger than the jump between 10.2 and 10.3.

That said, 10.3 feels snappier overall.

-Alex

Post Reply