Is The FW410 Really That Bad
Is The FW410 Really That Bad
Apologies for starting another thread regarding this interface as I have already read a fair bit on it in older posts.
However, I need to upgrade from my existing FW Audiophile (mainly for mobile mics pres and 5.1 monitoring) and the specs for the FW 410 look ideal for my needs. I have seen the new Ultralite from MOTU and would probably go for that except I need the upgrade fairly sharpish to help with uni projects. I also have Pro Tools M-Powered which I am keen to continue using, meaning that I need to stick to an M Audio interface.
It looks as though the Audiophile and 410 use the same drivers (correct me if i'm wrong) and I haven't had any problems with my AP on both an Athlon 64 desktop and iBook G4...
Any more opinons from 410 users would be appreciated as my limited funds have to spent wisely.
However, I need to upgrade from my existing FW Audiophile (mainly for mobile mics pres and 5.1 monitoring) and the specs for the FW 410 look ideal for my needs. I have seen the new Ultralite from MOTU and would probably go for that except I need the upgrade fairly sharpish to help with uni projects. I also have Pro Tools M-Powered which I am keen to continue using, meaning that I need to stick to an M Audio interface.
It looks as though the Audiophile and 410 use the same drivers (correct me if i'm wrong) and I haven't had any problems with my AP on both an Athlon 64 desktop and iBook G4...
Any more opinons from 410 users would be appreciated as my limited funds have to spent wisely.
The input (recording) sound quality is good, my mic sounds warm. But unless you also have a Fiber Optic mixer then you only have 2 inputs (1 stereo set) you also can't just record whatever you hear on the PC like streaming audio, or DVD sound, My hardware control over the volume looses connection all the time then I have to bring up the software mixer...and tech support still havn't fixed it after 4 months of complaining.
"I spent my life, laughing, wondering if crazy people even realized that they're crazy.......then one day, I realized..." - Flippa
-
ultrasource
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:17 pm
- Location: nj
-
donnydonny
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:36 am
- Location: San Francisco, USA
- Contact:
for a mobile interface, i'd recommend the presonus firebox over just about anything. it has 4 inputs, 2 awesome mic pre's, and 6 outputs for 5.1 monitoring (like you mentioned).
another option would be the focusrite saffire. it's only got 2 line/mic inputs but it has 8 analog outs for 5.1 or 7.1 monitoring (again, like mentioned). hope this helps even the slightest bit.
another option would be the focusrite saffire. it's only got 2 line/mic inputs but it has 8 analog outs for 5.1 or 7.1 monitoring (again, like mentioned). hope this helps even the slightest bit.
Macbook Pro 2.16GHz, 3GB, OS X 10.6.2, Live 7.0.18 (Triceratopz), Torq 1.5.2, M-Audio Xponent, Access Virus TI Polar, Trigger Finger
-
mezzmerized
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:34 pm
- Location: Memphis
- Contact:
I use the Presonus firebox.
It is great.
2 excellent class A pre's, phantom power, great sound. I'm upgrading to the Firepod. More inputs needed to record a whole band.
If you are interested in a good deal on a one month old firebox in excellent condition, hit me up.
It is great.
2 excellent class A pre's, phantom power, great sound. I'm upgrading to the Firepod. More inputs needed to record a whole band.
If you are interested in a good deal on a one month old firebox in excellent condition, hit me up.
Ah, that shows you the power of music, that magician of magician, who lifts his wand and says his mysterious word and all things real pass away and the phantoms of your mind walk before you clothed in flesh.
-
mezzmerized
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:34 pm
- Location: Memphis
- Contact:
I use the Presonus firebox.
It is great.
2 excellent class A pre's, phantom power, great sound, ultra-low latency(4ms total sys!. I'm upgrading to the Firepod. More inputs needed to record a whole band.
If you are interested in a good deal on a one month old firebox in excellent condition, hit me up.
It is great.
2 excellent class A pre's, phantom power, great sound, ultra-low latency(4ms total sys!. I'm upgrading to the Firepod. More inputs needed to record a whole band.
If you are interested in a good deal on a one month old firebox in excellent condition, hit me up.
Ah, that shows you the power of music, that magician of magician, who lifts his wand and says his mysterious word and all things real pass away and the phantoms of your mind walk before you clothed in flesh.
I had a firebox and thought it was good to start with, easy to use, no problems there but I couldn't gurantee the mic pre's are that good, I don't know heaps but when doing the setting up latency lesson in live inspecting the waveforms closely showed some wierd stuff like it wasn't being recorded properly, i was never 100% happy with the sound of the recordings, the output quality was fine though. Also, I was getting different latency readings on different occasions and no reason why i should ?
The Motu in comparison, i am a LOT happier with, hang out for the ultralite if you can.
The Motu in comparison, i am a LOT happier with, hang out for the ultralite if you can.
-
donnydonny
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:36 am
- Location: San Francisco, USA
- Contact:
i've had a firewire 410 for 2 years - no real problems with it..
the main thing IS the lack of inputs
and i am sure there are alot better options out there now. - but at the time i brought it - i'm sure it was by far the cheapest firewire audio interface out there...
seeems like m audio do have some quality control issues to say the least tho..
the main thing IS the lack of inputs
and i am sure there are alot better options out there now. - but at the time i brought it - i'm sure it was by far the cheapest firewire audio interface out there...
seeems like m audio do have some quality control issues to say the least tho..
Thinking I might just keep hold of the FW Audiophile so I can still use Pro Tools and then look to get the Ultralite as soon as it comes out. The amount of money i'm gonna get back on the AP isn't gonna make a lot of difference to the outlay for a new interface. The point about the lack of inputs on the 410 is also a factor too.
This is perhaps a bit of a luxury option (especially for someone as skint as I am) but i'm starting to get a few more gigs now so it should be worth it....
This is perhaps a bit of a luxury option (especially for someone as skint as I am) but i'm starting to get a few more gigs now so it should be worth it....
-
ultrasource
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:17 pm
- Location: nj
bong, i'm gonna be ditching my fw410 for the MOTU ultralight, also. The consensus here is that the MOTUs are pretty decent. I've also seen a couple of motu installs that have withstood the test of time. this is my second m-audio firewire solution and i don't want to be bamboozled on my third.
best of luck. i think there is a "you get what you pay for" lesson with all low-mid priced firewire solutions.
best of luck. i think there is a "you get what you pay for" lesson with all low-mid priced firewire solutions.
HP L2000 | Live 5 + Operator | MOTU 828mkII | other stuff
-
sans soleil
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:59 pm
- Location: toronto
- Contact:
-
sonsofthehounds
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: alba
you'll get a second hand motu828 for less than a 410 new....I went down this road after changing over to live, the 410 was just killing the processing power. After much deliberation i now have a second hand 828 mk 1...it is class.
if you're using a mac don't even bother with the 410.
Do agree tho, you will hear more people having problems with it just because so many people use it.
if you're using a mac don't even bother with the 410.
Do agree tho, you will hear more people having problems with it just because so many people use it.
macbook 2.16 ghz, live 6...studio with gear now gathering dust.