huffcw wrote: Yes it does = very bad - and, if true, may contribute to people perceiving the sound of Live as inferior to other DAWs. Ableton should be focusing on fixing the sound quality - a top priority for the next release I would think. Although I think it would only come into play if the signal in Live is at a very high frequency.
Well first of all, I have Live 5, Sonar 5 PE and Audition 2, and I really don't think that Live is "inferior" at all, even though Sonar has its much trumpeted 64-bit mix engine.
Regarding the charts, as I understand them, Ableton - and most other popular sequencers, such as Sonar, Logic and Cubase - is not particularly good at sample rate conversions. Nor for that matter are some of the specialised tools - if I understand the graphs correctly, Soundforge doesn't appear to work at all!! Generally though specialised tools such as Adobe Audition are better at sample rate conversion than sequencers are. So far, not exactly shocking news, then.
From a practical point of view though, I think it might be wise to record at 44.1kHz rather than 96 kHz (which I do anyway), in which case sample rate conversion simply isn't an issue anyway, assuming you plan to export at 44.1.