I try to be less 'judgemental' about it. I'll usually say (when in the right places!) that Islam "does not exist". The Qur'an exists, the Sunnah exists, a number of traditions, young and old, for interpreting and applying the sources exist and they're all dependent on extra-Islamic sources or the interpretations of a number of persons that existed at specific points in time in specific place on Earth. And they all have dogma that can't be questioned which are dependent upon this interpretations that are conditioned by coming to be at a certain point in time in a specific place on Earth.ethios4 wrote:I feel much the same about christianity...it irks me when I see/hear misinformation out there about it. In the case of christianity, the problem of misinformation applies heavily to christians. IMHO, most christians operate under a misunderstanding/misinformation of what it means to be a christian, ie, person who lives by faith in Christ. This christian misunderstanding is a big problem today, and leads to all sorts of violent radical behavior (Bush?).
The traditions are real, they all claim to be Islamic even though they may not agree on more than two articles of faith. This is what makes talking about 'Islam' so damn difficult, especially these days. The same is true for Christianity, as far as I understand, there's about a million different sects, some of which seem to be completely unrelated. To me, this makes the idea of one capital-C Christianity (and trying to define it) entirely political in nature.
-Paws