if you read it, you'll see how I clearly map the context of our conversation, so that we may see where I am constantly & completely changing the subject, and insulting you.
sigh - here we go again.
you call someone a bootlicking self serving idiot, who knows as much about 911 as jerry lewis does on deep sea diving. I already conceded I called you a jackass (the rest being an accurate description of you & your behaviour here) to which you retort with some questions and insults of your own, which have nothing to do with fact mind you.....and, sticking with the context of what you say and the questions you asked, I replied as one might expect. Calling you an angry little shit.....as well as answering you.
the whole purpose of that long transcription up there was to point out more of your sweeping generalisations. I left plenty of opportunies up there for you to join in and highlight exactly where it is I am changing the subject completely.
I'm surprised you would proove my point with your 'insult 1 2 3 HAHAHA' post. willfully ignoring my concessions, and quoting me insulting you AFTER you had already accused me of constantly changing the subject and insulting you - at which stage I had only injected the word 'jackass' into an otherwise perfectly accurate observation.
so really, you have only one insult there. which I already conceded, you jackass.
everything else you brought on yourself and was well within the running context and within the subject range of your statements and questions. not only that it was said after you had alread labeled me an insulting subject changer, and said my only contribution to the forum is nothing but garbage and pure drivl. lol, and you quote me as If i'm bullying you or that I said those things prior to your initial claims.
so anyways, please ...read that long post up there - and show me where I was constantly changing the subject. you probably wont, because you definatly cant.
and at the time, my constant insults was the word 'jackass'
HAHAHAHAH