its not about postcount - exactly my point. Why wasnt supster elected to alpha test ? Cos he calls it how he sees it, thats my feeling on the matter. or he was busy, this remains to be seen. Like I've said, theres at least one alpha tester who was elected sheerly because he's a asskissing mega-poster. That stinks of cynical marketing to me...hoffman2k wrote:It's not about postcount or anything.
It's all about content. For every 25 posts filled with nonsense, there's at least one gem
also this isnt so much 'live 6' bashing...but criticism of ableton and its apparent business plan. I'm pissed off for how long I waited for live 5 to stabilise and the shoulder shrugging replies from support. It amounted to beta testing the software for them, given the amount of detailed reports I emailed [&tired of]. I didnt use live 5 for months until 5.03 dropped (because it was unusable for on-the-fly loop recording) - , and then 5.03 introduced even more annoying bugs fucking with the sound output and not just fucking with my on-the-fly recording. by the time 5.2 comes out , they've followed that up with an announcement of live 5's replacement, before 5 is barely even stabilised.
so now they are telling me (via they're posts on this forum) that for the months I/we waited for them to fix live 5, the majority of coding was spent working on live6 and more importantly Sampler, an extra-fee device. And no word of any kind of kick-back for the poor shmucks who paid for 5 early on, who waited an obscene amount of time for it to work as it says on the box. On-the-fly looping people, how the -FUCK- is it acceptable to let the 'uNeVeN LoOps' bug go on for as long as it did ? ...an integral part of the program going by their marketing spiel, and integral to my use of the program.
so not only was that live 5 experience a shambles, but before it finished live 6 is announced. with the oh-so-'modular' pricing scheme - it only compounds and revitalises negative feelings from the live 5 endurance test.
there's nothing to suggest that these greedy bastards wont be coding more pay-for features instead of stabilising what we will have already paid for.
what are the chances an extra charge device called 'Slicer' will be available come live 7?....any takers ? 11/5 odds.
abes,
in short, spend your coding time making the current product work AS ADVERTISED and/or stable.
then spend your coding time on its replacement.
Or give the early adopters a greater incentive to keep throwing money at you, seeing as you've already admitted you spent time coding more pay-for-features while the current product suffered.
RE: adamjay and deragatory comments etc
there's at least two varities of trolls on this board. The inflamatory ones and the reactionary ones, adamjay & co have the inflaming down to a fine art. 'tongue in cheek' ...i call BULLSHIT on that one old bean. Do what you do, just dont claim innocence. and dont criticise people for reacting badly to your <sarcasm>not-at-all-pompous</sarcasm> 'tongue-in-cheek' remarks.