Angstrom wrote:we all know that dance music can easilly be made by a chimp on E, and it's often commented that the box can make better trance if you leave it alone in a room.
so here it is, via music thing
"The basic concept behind it is that most "classic" dance music is so formulaic it should be easy for a computer to generate. Generating all patterns and sequences from a small set of rules the unit is able to deliver new and original tracks in realtime." Obviously this is easy enough to do in software, but Mungo has actually made a hardware box.
http://home.netspeed.com.au/aistorm/Trance.html
there's a set by DJ Grey Box on there in mp3 , it's pretty damn convincing
have a listen
http://home.netspeed.com.au/aistorm/Fir ... 20Dump.mp3
Shit music will always be shit music. If you take shit music, put it in a box and press play, it will always be a box of shit that plays shit music. Nothing more. Having said that, i think blasting a particular type of music for being easy to make is kind of stupid. Any type of music genre has specific patterns that make it, essentially, a part of that genre.
I don't doubt that someone could program this Shit Box to make any type of genre, pop, hiphop, even jazz. There's no genre specific music that is immune to broad generalizations and over simplifications that would allow it to be programmed by a machine (which is still programmed by a human.) If you're going to take music and break it down to the sum of it's parts like that, then you're just creating an algorythm, like any other. No different.
If we continue to think along these lines, then you're just ready to accept that the human aspect of making music is not inherently necessary. I don't agree. All these posts of generative music, and Robert Henke's post as well.. they're all nice, but in the end, there really isn't the emotion, subtlety, and nuance that you get with a human touch, which is what we're coming back to.
Tools are just tools. Rules are made to be broken, only after understanding why you're breaking them. In the end, broad generalizations like that music sux because this aspect of it is too simplistic, yadda, yadda.. that's just taking a pot shot. There's plenty of emotional music out there, even within stagnant genre's such as trance, pop, etc.
What it boils down to, and why Shit Box's like these are really irrelevant, is the human aspect of any genre, genre crossing and melding, and then outright originality, for which genre generalizations are really mundane, at best. Just because there are Shit Producing Monkeys and Shit Producing Boxen, doesn't mean that a whole genre needs to be relegated to shit, and that surprises aren't able to occur.
Take DnB... any monkey can take an 808 and make a reese bass groove to an amen break. That doesn't mean that DnB is dead, or needs to be cracked on. It just needs to be taken to a new level. And, with that in mind, no music is really original, now is it? We all stand on the backs of giants.
BTW, have you heard that track. It's laughable. To say that all trance sounds like that is too.