OT Bush calls Lebanon A new front for global war on terror

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
deva
Posts: 1685
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Post by deva » Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:59 pm

ethios4 wrote:That is not to say Israel or the US should not defend themselves when necessary, and I think Israel is to be commended for dropping leaflets warning Lebanese citizens of impending bombings...

I find it interesting that the so called defenders always manage to be defending themselves in someone elses country... hmmm

Also, Israel dropping leaflets was psychological warfare, not something to be commended. The leaflet telling them they better leave should have said, if you stay in your home we will bomb you, and if you get in your car you make a good target on the road. It was an effort to ramp up fear, not humanitarian, though it was used to create that facade.

subterFUSE
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Winter Park, FL

Post by subterFUSE » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:15 pm

I ask this? What is the definition of terrorism? I challenge you to define it in such a way that does not make exlusive allowances for Israeli or US aggression. What is the US's official definition of terrorism?

Without looking up any references, I would define terrorism as a tactic of asymmetric warfare. One which violates the rules of war in a number of ways, but primarily through the specific targeting of civilians, and the use of non-uniformed combatants.
M-Tech D900T laptop, 17" WSXGA+ wide-screen, Intel Pentium 4 3.4 GHz HT (600 series) 2 MB cache, 2048 RAM (Dual Channel DDR2 PC4200 533 MHz), Dual hard drives: 80 gig x 2 = 160 gig SATA 5400 rpm (RAID 0 config)
Korg Zero 8 mixer/soundcard/MIDI

rtopia
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:58 am
Location: undisclosed u. s. a. earth
Contact:

Post by rtopia » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:15 pm

deva wrote: find it interesting that the so called defenders always manage to be defending themselves in someone elses country... hmmm
what?

is it anymore interesting the enemy they're fighting isn't from Lebanon either?

- r

deva
Posts: 1685
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Post by deva » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:55 pm

rtopia wrote:
deva wrote: find it interesting that the so called defenders always manage to be defending themselves in someone elses country... hmmm
what?

is it anymore interesting the enemy they're fighting isn't from Lebanon either?

- r
Not sure what you are referring to, but Hezbollah is a Lebanese movement, fighting in its home country against an aggressor who is invading it.

glu
Posts: 2769
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:27 am

Post by glu » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:20 am

CNN wrote:U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan is "deeply concerned" about Israel's commando raid in eastern Lebanon Saturday, which he said violated the cease-fire resolution concerning Israel and Hezbollah, his spokesman said. However, the Israel Defense Forces defended Saturday's operation, saying it was aimed at preventing the transfer of weapons from Iran and Syria to Hezbollah.
Discuss...
no prevailing genre of music:
http://alonetone.com/glu

rtopia
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:58 am
Location: undisclosed u. s. a. earth
Contact:

Post by rtopia » Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:18 am

deva wrote:Not sure what you are referring to, but Hezbollah is a Lebanese movement, fighting in its home country against an aggressor who is invading it.
I was referring to the Syrians and Iranians involvement in arming/re-arming Hezbollah.

If Hezbollah is representative of the Lebanese government - Lebanon isn't doing much to claim them.

While it's true that Israel has invaded Lebanon - it's not agression.

Crossing a border in response to an attack that originated on the other side of that border is a defense tactic.

ethios4
Posts: 5377
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 6:28 am

Post by ethios4 » Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:54 am

glu wrote:
CNN wrote:U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan is "deeply concerned" about Israel's commando raid in eastern Lebanon Saturday, which he said violated the cease-fire resolution concerning Israel and Hezbollah, his spokesman said. However, the Israel Defense Forces defended Saturday's operation, saying it was aimed at preventing the transfer of weapons from Iran and Syria to Hezbollah.
The White House declined to criticize the raid, noting that Israel said it acted in reaction to arms smuggling into Lebanon and that the U.N. resolution calls for the prevention of resupplying Hezbollah with weapons.
Is the UN not concerned that Hezbollah is being resupplied?

deva
Posts: 1685
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Post by deva » Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:01 am

rtopia wrote:
deva wrote:Not sure what you are referring to, but Hezbollah is a Lebanese movement, fighting in its home country against an aggressor who is invading it.
I was referring to the Syrians and Iranians involvement in arming/re-arming Hezbollah.

If Hezbollah is representative of the Lebanese government - Lebanon isn't doing much to claim them.

While it's true that Israel has invaded Lebanon - it's not agression.

Crossing a border in response to an attack that originated on the other side of that border is a defense tactic.

Many people and countries around the world purchase or are given arms from other countries.

Hezbollah are Lebanese. They are an outgrowth of the Lebanese people. Hezbollah has elected members of the Lebanese government. And Lebanon is claiming them. Polls show that almost 90% of the Lebanese population now supports Hezbollah.

Hezbollah is a social and political organization.

And yes, Israel's invasion is an act of aggression. It is now a matter of public fact that it was planned for months before the incident that started it. Israel has routinely raided across the Lebanese border and has taken prisoners. Far more often than Hezbollah. Hezbollah captured the soldiers and offered a prisoner exchange. Such is to be expected when you are routinely flying fighter jets into another countries airspace and conducting frequent raids across their border. To claim outrage when others do as you do, is nothing but opportunistic posturing.

stinky
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:06 am

Post by stinky » Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:02 am

ethios4 wrote:
glu wrote:
CNN wrote:U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan is "deeply concerned" about Israel's commando raid in eastern Lebanon Saturday, which he said violated the cease-fire resolution concerning Israel and Hezbollah, his spokesman said. However, the Israel Defense Forces defended Saturday's operation, saying it was aimed at preventing the transfer of weapons from Iran and Syria to Hezbollah.
The White House declined to criticize the raid, noting that Israel said it acted in reaction to arms smuggling into Lebanon and that the U.N. resolution calls for the prevention of resupplying Hezbollah with weapons.
Is the UN not concerned that Hezbollah is being resupplied?
I think what people have to understand is that, in the UN, there are alot of more arab and muslim countries, i'd say a majority group, than any other alliance. I mean, you could say that the 'west' is an alliance, but there's no common bond, other than economic. The west is so polarized as to not be able to put on a united front in any regard, because it's too afraid to back a consensus that disregards each country's voting majority...
The Talented Mr Stinky.

Live Racks Abe-Wiki

rtopia
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:58 am
Location: undisclosed u. s. a. earth
Contact:

Post by rtopia » Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:46 am

deva wrote: Hezbollah is a social and political organization
Okay then...
Just so I'm completely "unconfused"...
...which social and political organization in the US would you compare them to?

Green Party? (what the hell - they're wearing green everytime I see them)
GOP?
Democratic Party?
Peace and Freedom?
PTA?
deva wrote:To claim outrage when others do as you do, is nothing but opportunistic posturing.
So what do you call it when these "others" routinely proclaim your country has no legimate right to exist and your purpose is to wipe your country off of the map?

- r

ps. rtopia knows this discussion is pointless (minds will not be changed here)

Benshik
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:45 am
Location: Moscow/Montreal

Post by Benshik » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:03 am

deva wrote:Hezbollah are Lebanese.
oh come on! :)


it aint funny, but to make the horror more tolerable, some people like to joke that in this war the Americans are ready to fight to the last Israeli standing, and the Iranians to the last Libanese standing...
Macbook 2.2ghz, OS 10.5.2, Focusrite Saffire, Microkontrol, Lemur

deva
Posts: 1685
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Post by deva » Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:10 pm

rtopia wrote:
deva wrote: Hezbollah is a social and political organization
Okay then...
Just so I'm completely "unconfused"...
...which social and political organization in the US would you compare them to?

Green Party? (what the hell - they're wearing green everytime I see them)
GOP?
Democratic Party?
Peace and Freedom?
PTA?
hmmm...

Black Panthers come to mind. The Panthers were a minority black organization in struggle against the racist white nation within which they were forced to live which is different from Hezbollah which is struggling against racist white imperialism from outside their country.
rtopia wrote:
deva wrote:To claim outrage when others do as you do, is nothing but opportunistic posturing.
So what do you call it when these "others" routinely proclaim your country has no legimate right to exist and your purpose is to wipe your country off of the map?

- r

ps. rtopia knows this discussion is pointless (minds will not be changed here)
Oh please, drop that tired, unexamined propaganda. If Jewish control of the State of Israel can only be maintained by repression, then it has no more right to exist than Apartheid South Africa, and more importantly than some theoretical 'right' it cannot endure under those circumstances.

The State of Israel was created by Western powers and imposed upon the people that lived on the land. It must be recognized that this was unjust. The majority of Arab peoples do not want to 'drive every Jew into the sea'. Hezbollah does not claim that. The problem is with the government of Israel. It's expansionist tendencies, Zionist ideology, and treatment of Palestinians. Hamas and Hezbollah have just causes. You may not like tactical choices they make, but when the powers you favor use the same tactics, labeling one 'terrorist' is really just a way to marginalize.

Neither does Hezbollah desire to 'destroy America' or other such rubbish. They clearly state they oppose western imperialism imposing itself upon them. They state very clearly, you leave us alone, we'll leave you alone. They say different cultures, religions and social structures can peacefully co-exist if they respect each other. Nowehere do they say they want to 'wipe the U.S. off the map. That is such a tired and unfounded rhetoric.

Israel cannot survive on the path it is on. More Israelis are leaving the country than people immigrating to the country. The government of Israel is betraying the interests of its people. I believe a 1 state solution is the only viable long term solution, but whatever the solution, it needs to happen. It may come down to that, or global war with everyone losing.

The us or them mentality is leading us all to doom. It is physics. For every action there is a reaction. You create what you fear. The U.S., saying Iraq is a threat of Islamic fundamentalism, attacks it and turns a secular nation, into a more theocratic one. Such a mindset is bankrupt of intelligence and subtlety. It can only lead to a worse situation. Life can never be pigeon-holed into black and white dichotomy. As I said in an earlier post, such us and them thinking, is the soil of fascism.

It was just such thinking, that led to the conclusion that Jews, homosexuals, cripples etc must be exterminated. We have to protect the fatherland, our way of life, our racial identity/purity. Now we have the U.S. saying we must protect our homeland, way of life, that 'they' want to kill 'us' for our freedom. It is us or them, we must subjugate/exterminate Arab/Islamic peoples.

The United States is perilously close to a full on fascist police state. It is valuable to read up on how Germany went from a republic to a dictatorship. When the Nazi party came to power in 1933, it was not instantly a totalitarian regime. The change happened over some years. Looking at the progression of changed laws over that time, it is quite similar to the changes in law and precedent in the U.S. All the laws needed to impose martial law in the U.S. and suspend the rights of citizens are in place. It is but waiting for the moment to act upon them. There are members of Congress talking about rounding up dissidents because they are 'aiding the terrorists'. That such talk can happen with impunity in the halls of power, even from just a few congressional members, should scare the shit out of everyone.

Here is an excerpt from an article regarding police and the transition to dictatorship in Germany:

"The Nazis came to power in Germany in January 1933 and established a dictatorship, ending the 12-year German experiment with democracy, the Weimar Republic. Yet the police, who had been charged with defending the Weimar Republic, were integrated relatively easily into the Nazi regime. There was neither a wholesale purge nor a wholesale resignation of policemen.

Most policemen in 1933 were not Nazis, though they were overwhelmingly conservative. They thought of themselves as neutral professionals and as impartial servants of the law. Their personal politics were supposed to be irrelevant to their duties."

stinky
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:06 am

Post by stinky » Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:23 pm

deva wrote:
Oh please, drop that tired, unexamined propaganda. If Jewish control of the State of Israel can only be maintained by repression, then it has no more right to exist than Apartheid South Africa, and more importantly than some theoretical 'right' it cannot endure under those circumstances.

The State of Israel was created by Western powers and imposed upon the people that lived on the land. It must be recognized that this was unjust. The majority of Arab peoples do not want to 'drive every Jew into the sea'. Hezbollah does not claim that. The problem is with the government of Israel. It's expansionist tendencies, Zionist ideology, and treatment of Palestinians. Hamas and Hezbollah have just causes. You may not like tactical choices they make, but when the powers you favor use the same tactics, labeling one 'terrorist' is really just a way to marginalize.
Man, you are fucking blind as a bat.. Nasrallah has repeatedly said Israel should be destroyed.. so has Ahmenijad... wake the fuck up man...
The Talented Mr Stinky.

Live Racks Abe-Wiki

subterFUSE
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Winter Park, FL

Post by subterFUSE » Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:00 pm

stinky wrote:
deva wrote:
Oh please, drop that tired, unexamined propaganda. If Jewish control of the State of Israel can only be maintained by repression, then it has no more right to exist than Apartheid South Africa, and more importantly than some theoretical 'right' it cannot endure under those circumstances.

The State of Israel was created by Western powers and imposed upon the people that lived on the land. It must be recognized that this was unjust. The majority of Arab peoples do not want to 'drive every Jew into the sea'. Hezbollah does not claim that. The problem is with the government of Israel. It's expansionist tendencies, Zionist ideology, and treatment of Palestinians. Hamas and Hezbollah have just causes. You may not like tactical choices they make, but when the powers you favor use the same tactics, labeling one 'terrorist' is really just a way to marginalize.
Man, you are fucking blind as a bat.. Nasrallah has repeatedly said Israel should be destroyed.. so has Ahmenijad... wake the fuck up man...

Stinky is correct.


Nasrallah has not only called for the destruction of Israel, but the destruction of all Jews in the world. This isn't a land dispute to him, but an all out war where the only solution is genocide.

"if they [Jews] all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide." - Hassan Nasrallah
M-Tech D900T laptop, 17" WSXGA+ wide-screen, Intel Pentium 4 3.4 GHz HT (600 series) 2 MB cache, 2048 RAM (Dual Channel DDR2 PC4200 533 MHz), Dual hard drives: 80 gig x 2 = 160 gig SATA 5400 rpm (RAID 0 config)
Korg Zero 8 mixer/soundcard/MIDI

forge
Posts: 17422
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Queensland, AU
Contact:

Post by forge » Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:07 pm

stinky wrote:
Man, you are fucking blind as a bat.. Nasrallah has repeatedly said Israel should be destroyed.. so has Ahmenijad... wake the fuck up man...
did you not read any of the rest of deva's post? or did you just think that one point was easy to argue with so you went for that?! :D

Deva made some really good posts there.

One of the most fitting things I've seen to illustrate the level of apathy that will allow the American empire to quickly sour and become like fascism was an interview with an obviously not too bright middle ranking officer in the US army at guantanemo bay saying in defense to the total lack of human rights/geneva convention and all that "well, the United states does not have a reputation for abusing human rights" or some such.

Oh well, good then. The United states does not have a reputation for abusing human rights.

well in that case, I have no problem with some trailer trash deep south hillbilly guarding me in a prison with no supervision because "THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT HAVE A REPUTATION FOR ABUSING HUMAN RIGHTS."

GREAT! A real PROMISE!

never mind being held accountable to anyone, having any kind of feeling of owing it to the world to prove that you are worthy - just say "we dont have a reputation"...blah blah blah and everything will be fine!

If you're not with us your against us!

We are the goodies, and we're gonna get them injuns!

Sorry about that rant there.

Post Reply