duo core vs core 2 duo any results?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
glu
Posts: 2769
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:27 am

duo core vs core 2 duo any results?

Post by glu » Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:57 pm

It would be a nice visual to see an A/b comparison btw the two CPUs running live, has this been posted here? I am wondering how big of a difference the core2duo makes.
no prevailing genre of music:
http://alonetone.com/glu

muscleandhate
Posts: 693
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:54 pm

Post by muscleandhate » Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:31 pm

I doubt it is 39%, as Apple claim.

Machinate
Posts: 11648
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by Machinate » Thu Oct 26, 2006 10:52 pm

there are some core2duo performance tests in the perf. thread.
mbp 2.66, osx 10.6.8, 8GB ram.

stale bread
Posts: 1101
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by stale bread » Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:31 am

anybody got more on this
Mac, Mpc, and a Microphone

Thanks for the Slicer Abe.

arctic ranger
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:49 am
Location: inuvik NT/vancouver BC

Post by arctic ranger » Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:49 am

muscleandhate wrote:I doubt it is 39%, as Apple claim.
+1

i got a duo core and i cant even get close to maxing this thing out
mpb c2d, remote sl, mpc1000, korg legacy, zebra 2, phoscyon, devastator

http://soundcloud.com/enrock/first-edit

djsentinel
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:11 pm

Post by djsentinel » Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:51 am

arctic ranger wrote:
muscleandhate wrote:I doubt it is 39%, as Apple claim.
+1

i got a duo core and i cant even get close to maxing this thing out
I've already maxed it out, and I have 8 frozen tracks.

stale bread
Posts: 1101
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by stale bread » Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:03 am

djsentinel what's the rest of the layout for your set so we can know what you're talking about and what are your macs specs/model
Mac, Mpc, and a Microphone

Thanks for the Slicer Abe.

stinky
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:06 am

Post by stinky » Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:27 am

djsentinel wrote:
I've already maxed it out, and I have 8 frozen tracks.
well, you must be using some heavy plugs, or system is configured incorrectly, because I have a p4 3Ghz 768mb ram, and i can get more than 8 frozen tracks and still not max out. Granted, I know how to squeeze every bit of performance out of this thing, but if I had a core2duo, I would never ever get maxed out, i'm certain of this. I get a macbook pro at the end of the month, and i'll know for sure then.
The Talented Mr Stinky.

Live Racks Abe-Wiki

FORMAT
Posts: 1776
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 12:13 pm
Contact:

Post by FORMAT » Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:27 am

There's an interesting thread here for Logic and new Mac, even though the new Book is not listed yet: http://www.logicuser.de/forum/viewtopic ... sc&start=0

Interesting note: While the Mac Pro is by faaaar the best performer, the IMacs and MacBook Pros seem to be about equal.

slzero
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by slzero » Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:31 pm

glu wrote:It would be a nice visual to see an A/b comparison btw the two CPUs running live, has this been posted here? I am wondering how big of a difference the core2duo makes.
Not two separate cpu's but a similar sort of test reported in SOS.
Live 6 review in Nov 06 issue of SOS has tested Live6 using a dual-G5 MAC. They claim twice as much cpu gain by stating that cpu usage dropped from 37 percent on single cpu mode to 19 percent after turning on multi-core support in Live6 Preferences. This was tested using 10 midi tracks and one Simpler Bass patch with effects. Review contains some other interesting and related info as well.

Machinate
Posts: 11648
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by Machinate » Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:35 pm

FORMAT wrote:Interesting note: While the Mac Pro is by faaaar the best performer, the IMacs and MacBook Pros seem to be about equal.
And that is also the conclusion in the Ableton Live performance thread.........................
mbp 2.66, osx 10.6.8, 8GB ram.

stale bread
Posts: 1101
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by stale bread » Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:43 pm

Machinate wrote:
FORMAT wrote:Interesting note: While the Mac Pro is by faaaar the best performer, the IMacs and MacBook Pros seem to be about equal.
And that is also the conclusion in the Ableton Live performance thread.........................
so is that saying that macbooks and pros are basicly the same and if one doesn't need super graphics the pro offers no musical advantage over the macbook..

or is it saying something else?
Mac, Mpc, and a Microphone

Thanks for the Slicer Abe.

Tarekith
Posts: 19140
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Tarekith » Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:39 pm

Read again, it's iMacs and MBP's, not Macbooks and MBP's.

I'll have a Live 5 performance test on a C2D MBP up in a little bit.

stale bread
Posts: 1101
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:09 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by stale bread » Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Tarekith wrote:Read again, it's iMacs and MBP's, not Macbooks and MBP's.

I'll have a Live 5 performance test on a C2D MBP up in a little bit.
cool
Mac, Mpc, and a Microphone

Thanks for the Slicer Abe.

So Solid Poo
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:56 pm

Re: duo core vs core 2 duo any results?

Post by So Solid Poo » Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:42 pm

glu wrote:It would be a nice visual to see an A/b comparison btw the two CPUs running live, has this been posted here? I am wondering how big of a difference the core2duo makes.
mekz no diffrence 2 da beetz jus meks ur box run fastah so chill git n mpc insted

Post Reply