midi step sequencer instrument

Share what you’d like to see added to Ableton Live.
Legions of Laptops
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:06 pm

Post by Legions of Laptops » Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:41 pm

deva wrote: Much different than the Live arp.
you can do lots with the live arp maybe you haven't exhausted all the possibilites... it is very powerfull.
You can even have one feeding the other for some tricks.

But there could be a few models availble as plugins why not?

deva
Posts: 1685
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Post by deva » Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:10 am

hoffman2k wrote:
deva wrote:
hoffman2k wrote:Yeah. most of that is possible in Live too. It just isn't as obvious because you need to combine some plugins.

Thanks for explaining.

you can get many results in Live, but it is not intuitive, visual, and straightforward like with a pattern arp. It also is not interactive and playable in the same way.
I agree, the arp could use some enhancements. (so do all the MIDI plugins by the way...).
But saying that Live's arp is just a fancy randomizer, means that you haven't discovered the power of racks yet.
Yeah, the zebra arp is pretty cool. But in Live you can construct different arps with racks, untill you run out of ideas.

Anyway, I agree that we could use a better arp.
But I disagree that the current arp is just a simple toy.
It is made to be part of something bigger. Just like all of the MIDI plugins in Live...
I like learning new things, but I am doubtful that what I am looking for can be done in any sort of visual easy to edit and change kind of way.

Live's arp creates too many off notes. Use the scale to control the off notes, and you cannot play the arp with different chords as you cannot modulate the scale. Then you can create chains of scales in a rack to play different chords and now you are at a higher level of complexity and easy useability fails.

This does not cover being able to set step length in a pattern. This can be done with multiple arps in chains in a rack but it requires one to conceive the whole thing in the head without visual reference.

you still would not have chords when you specifically want them.

I have spent hours exploring the live arp and it just does not come close to what I have with the Z1, especially in the playability and ease of creation area.

ilia
Posts: 787
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 4:12 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by ilia » Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:33 am

punkdISCO wrote:It probably can not transmit but I am really liking the new NI FM8 Arpeggiator. It’s relatively powerful whilst remaining very simple.
I never really cared for these things, but after trying FM8 out I have to agree -- its arpeggiator/step sequencer really rocks! Too bad it can't transmit, something like that in Live would be lovely (and probably easy to write)...

deva
Posts: 1685
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Post by deva » Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:24 am

Yeah, FM8 has a nice arp... playable and easy to understand. With some extra capability, and midi output, I would happily pay for something like that so that it can be used with any synth.

Machinesworking
Posts: 11551
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by Machinesworking » Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:59 am

hoffman2k wrote:Yeah, the zebra arp is pretty cool. But in Live you can construct different arps with racks, untill you run out of ideas.

Anyway, I agree that we could use a better arp.
But I disagree that the current arp is just a simple toy.
It is made to be part of something bigger. Just like all of the MIDI plugins in Live...
You contradict yourself here, the arp in Live isn't that great, but if you combine it with Live's other elements, then it's got some use. If you'd said it that way, it would have made more sense. It's the same logic that Logic users use every time people mention it's weak points, because the program itself is flexible they can get things done, but in no way does that make the process intuitive or miraculously endowed with an ergonomic workflow.
not trying to dog you hoffman, just noticing that Live is developing 'work arounds' for elements that are easy in other DAWs, like it has been in Logic, and that was a while ago, something Ableton would find distasteful.

deva
Posts: 1685
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Post by deva » Thu Dec 07, 2006 9:21 pm

Machinesworking wrote:
hoffman2k wrote:Yeah, the zebra arp is pretty cool. But in Live you can construct different arps with racks, untill you run out of ideas.

Anyway, I agree that we could use a better arp.
But I disagree that the current arp is just a simple toy.
It is made to be part of something bigger. Just like all of the MIDI plugins in Live...
You contradict yourself here, the arp in Live isn't that great, but if you combine it with Live's other elements, then it's got some use. If you'd said it that way, it would have made more sense. It's the same logic that Logic users use every time people mention it's weak points, because the program itself is flexible they can get things done, but in no way does that make the process intuitive or miraculously endowed with an ergonomic workflow.
not trying to dog you hoffman, just noticing that Live is developing 'work arounds' for elements that are easy in other DAWs, like it has been in Logic, and that was a while ago, something Ableton would find distasteful.

Even with racks and other midi effects, you cannot do with the Live arp what the Zebra2 arp can do. Sure, you could use racks, arps, other midi effects and manage to construct something that may play the same pattern as the Zebra or FM8 arp, but then change the chord or the number of notes held and it falls apart.

A good polyphonic pattern based arp is a playable instrument. By changing chords, number of notes held, you can play lovely, creative cascading waterfalls of notes and that are not forced repetitive but still have a consistent character.

hoffman2k
Posts: 14718
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by hoffman2k » Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:12 pm

Machinesworking wrote:
hoffman2k wrote:Yeah, the zebra arp is pretty cool. But in Live you can construct different arps with racks, untill you run out of ideas.

Anyway, I agree that we could use a better arp.
But I disagree that the current arp is just a simple toy.
It is made to be part of something bigger. Just like all of the MIDI plugins in Live...
You contradict yourself here, the arp in Live isn't that great, but if you combine it with Live's other elements, then it's got some use. If you'd said it that way, it would have made more sense. It's the same logic that Logic users use every time people mention it's weak points, because the program itself is flexible they can get things done, but in no way does that make the process intuitive or miraculously endowed with an ergonomic workflow.
not trying to dog you hoffman, just noticing that Live is developing 'work arounds' for elements that are easy in other DAWs, like it has been in Logic, and that was a while ago, something Ableton would find distasteful.
Yeah, i could have made more sense. Sorry about that.
I'm living in a world where the only things that are real, are those on my harddrive. I don't care if there are apps that do this and that.
I want Live to do it. The same applies to my other gear.
I want to know everything inside and out. So if have very few plugins and apps. But i know them inside and out.

Anyway. There's a story behind all the "work arounds".
Gerhard Behles once said that Live users shouldn't have to resort to work arounds.

I take those words very seriously. Hence all the "work arounds" ;)
If we can figure it out, thats half the work for the developers done.

Give me more macros and i'll give you an improved arp.
FYI: even though the Covert Seq is driven by MIDI clips, it can be driven by an arp (or arp combo).
The clips that make up the patterns still send the required automation for the step sequencer bit.
In other words, its a step sequenced arp with multiple choices for pattern combinations.

It's already possible with the Seq. But I have no clue how i'm ever going to explain all the tricks of that crazy rack. Let alone the other crazy stuff thats still under the wraps. But don't worry, I'll work around that obstacle :)

I guess the main point here is: What you see as a work around is something that I see as a perfect chance to bug Ableton about the limitations of the app. Simply providing proof of concept, in order to speed up the process of r&d.

It's a hobby like flyfishing or mountainbiking. But for the kind of geek who melts in sunlight :lol:

murphf
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:37 am

Post by murphf » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:05 pm


Post Reply