hope there's some solution to it on the horizon.
Live's working rock-solid on my amd 3500+ here...
mocker wrote:Question : how much RAM do you have ? I think this is very important.
Monitoring with Activity Monitor seems to lead to Josh's conclusion : during a long Live session memory's not released and drains to … almost no memory left, even with a 2 gb ram Macbook Core 2 Duo. That explains why closing the set's not enough and a restart of Live's necessary.
Meanwhile adding RAM seems to solve the problem (so far, I'm very cautious after my screwed up gig last week)
BTW Amaury did answer me in a related thread :
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=57148
This is also true of sampler,if you create a sampler preset,save then delete from the set,if you then try to manage the preset live informs you that the sample is in use when it's not,meaning you have to close the set to manage sampler presets, inconvenientJosh Von wrote: It says the clip is still being used in your set, when its not.


longjohns wrote: so I must ask - Josh do you think 1G of memory is cutting it on your system? I think it could be choking it



Hi Josh,Josh Von wrote: What is it about the design of this program that it cant look at this set and say "here are lots of audio clips, but most are empty data. Let me play the audio where there is data, and ignore these long sections of empty clips where theres nothing to do"
It doesnt do that. This is the kind of thing Im talking about. What does this point to insofar as how Live might be handling clip data in other, more complex areas?
Its not a good sign. Extremely inefficient imo and I think this kind of thing is the root of all these problems in one way or another
.
Hi .. no, I wasnt implying that we need a feature to address this by stripping data. Very easy in Live to just CTRL-E split delete or drag clip ends.Amaury wrote: But the kind of 'feature' you are asking for is kind of counter productive, I feel. How much processing would it take for a software to determine if it should ignore a track because it is silent? At which rate should it check, not to miss the first bit of sound? What about the treshold?
The computer doesn't know the difference and is working just as hard to stream all those zeros as it does at any other point in the .wav.Josh Von wrote:nothing taxing. But also note that the rest of the channels have clips with no data playing at this point,
I havent cut off the silent portions of the clips. So there are 49 tracks with clips with essentially no data at the intro
They are not empty. They are chock full of zeros, which take up just as much space as 1'smainly empty of data
Did this, and it seemed to not make a difference, which surprised me a bit. I know that sometimes my controllers go out of whack somehow and dramatically slow the system down until they are power cycled and the Live preferences reset.longjohns wrote:I suspect that the performance would be significantly worse with a controller in Mackie Mode, maybe that's the next thing for me to test...
longjohns wrote:
You should definitely trim off all the silence on every clip. Even if you drag the ends on the clip, you've still got many Gigs of blank .wav's clogging your HD
They are not empty. They are chock full of zeros, which take up just as much space as 1'smainly empty of data