Richard Dawkins: The God Delusion.

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:43 pm

Seyser Koze wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
Seyser Koze wrote:http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs200 ... on_ark.asp
That is a fucking classic. It will live forever in my new sig.

"The Bible is reliable in all areas, including its account of the Ark (and the worldwide catastrophic Flood). A Christian doesn’t have to have a blind faith to believe that there really was an Ark. What the Bible says about the Ark can even be measured and tested today."

Fucking priceless.
LOL, the Ark was actually 4'6 wide by 7692 miles long. Should be easy to spot.

I might order this...

https://shop.gospelcom.net/epages/AIGUK ... t/10-3-078

It's got to be worth every penny for pure entertainment.

Angstrom · Post by **Angstrom** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:54 pm

Oh I love that site,it is just full of Gems

the Bible is a revelation from our infinite Creator, and it is self-authenticating and self-attesting

self-authenticating, no problems there then.

ooh, we are so nearly at Judgment Day (page 100)

Seyser Koze · Post by **Seyser Koze** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:57 pm

If only there was an audio book available, that would make for some great samples for Live use!

Patch · Post by **Patch** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:59 pm

I'm sure this thread is a riveting read - but at 100 pages, I ain't got the time to read it all.

Damn - 100 pages...

Angstrom · Post by **Angstrom** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Seyser Koze wrote:If only there was an audio book available, that would make for some great samples for Live use!

http://shop.gospelcom.net/epages/AIGUK. ... AudioTapes

Creation Apologetics Audio Series
Hear the latest from some of the leading scientists involved in creation research around the world.

Machinate · Post by **Machinate** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:28 pm

Seyser Koze wrote:Whoa nearly there guys! Must break the hundred.
...

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs200 ... on_ark.asp

That ought to be page 100, right? [damn!]

These guys have some explaining to do:

When you realize that horses, zebras, and donkeys are probably descended from the horse-like “kind”, Noah did not have to carry two sets of each such animal. Also, dogs, wolves, and coyotes are probably from a single canine “kind”, so hundreds of different dogs were not needed.

So that would mean, that the "horse-like "kind""(cleverly avoiding the word "species")EVOLVED into horses, zebras and donkeys, and the canines diverged into wolves and coyotes and so on within just a few thousand years? Wait, evolution... that would mean.... !?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:34 pm

Machinate wrote:
Seyser Koze wrote:Whoa nearly there guys! Must break the hundred.
...

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs200 ... on_ark.asp
That ought to be page 100, right? [damn!]

These guys have some explaining to do:
When you realize that horses, zebras, and donkeys are probably descended from the horse-like “kind”, Noah did not have to carry two sets of each such animal. Also, dogs, wolves, and coyotes are probably from a single canine “kind”, so hundreds of different dogs were not needed.
So that would mean, that the "horse-like "kind""(cleverly avoiding the word "species")EVOLVED into horses, zebras and donkeys, and the canines diverged into wolves and coyotes and so on within just a few thousand years? Wait, evolution... that would mean.... !?

100?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:35 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
Machinate wrote:
Seyser Koze wrote:Whoa nearly there guys! Must break the hundred.
...

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs200 ... on_ark.asp
That ought to be page 100, right? [damn!]

These guys have some explaining to do:
When you realize that horses, zebras, and donkeys are probably descended from the horse-like “kind”, Noah did not have to carry two sets of each such animal. Also, dogs, wolves, and coyotes are probably from a single canine “kind”, so hundreds of different dogs were not needed.
So that would mean, that the "horse-like "kind""(cleverly avoiding the word "species")EVOLVED into horses, zebras and donkeys, and the canines diverged into wolves and coyotes and so on within just a few thousand years? Wait, evolution... that would mean.... !?

100?

100?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:35 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
Machinate wrote: That ought to be page 100, right? [damn!]

These guys have some explaining to do: So that would mean, that the "horse-like "kind""(cleverly avoiding the word "species")EVOLVED into horses, zebras and donkeys, and the canines diverged into wolves and coyotes and so on within just a few thousand years? Wait, evolution... that would mean.... !?

100?
100?

100?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:35 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
100?
100?
100?

100?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:36 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote: 100?
100?
100?

100?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:36 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote: 100?
100?
100?

100?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:36 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote: 100?
100?
100?

100?

NorthernMonkey · Post by **NorthernMonkey** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:36 pm

NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote:
NorthernMonkey wrote: 100?
100?
100?

I give up.

Seyser Koze · Post by **Seyser Koze** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:40 pm

And appropriate to say on the 100th page.

All hail the mighty correct Dawkinsgod!

Boo to the lunes of religiousness town. Go away to tend to your dinaosaurs, nuttaz!