REASON 4 - Propellerheads finally announce!!

stale bread · Post by **stale bread** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:18 pm

the fact that reason 4 has no way to just record some audio and slice it up, then easily map it to midi notes and trigger it in the reason sequencer just pisses me off.

they made recycle for petes sake.

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:19 pm

stale bread wrote:the fact that reason 4 has no way to just record some audio and slice it up, then easily map it to midi notes and trigger it in the reason sequencer just pisses me off.

they made recycle for petes sake.

If Reason did that, nobody would buy Recycle.

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:20 pm

Tone Deft wrote:
Amberience wrote:
JACKAL & HYDE wrote:
Not really for me and 10,000,000 other producers world wide. Maybe if I were doing classical/jazz pieces or scoring a drama. But for Rock, Pop, Industrial, Techno, hiphop etc automating the time signature is totally irrelevant and wouldnt be used 99.999% of the time. So for me, not a "shame" at all.
Don't listen to much progressive rock then?
Nobody does. That's the 0.0001%.

You sir, are full of shite.

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:22 pm

Amberience wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:
Amberience wrote: Don't listen to much progressive rock then?
Nobody does. That's the 0.0001%.
You sir, are full of shite.

You madame cannot counter the fact that nobody listens to prog rock that doesn't live in their mom's basement.

forge · Post by **forge** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:25 pm

I dont even think they need to worry about doing anything edit wise with audio in - they just need to make it possible as a kind of through so you can pipe audio through it's FX and filters and record to its samplers

like real samplers can record

the whole virtual rack concept is fine and great idea, they dont need to try and be another audio sequencer or arranger, but they could at least let their samplers SAMPLE!

that is really the only reason you'd want it - I reckon most people use it with another host anyway, the main problem with no audio in actually for me was just not being able to use the maelstrom filters really - they were cool

but yeah, recording straight into dr. rex and slicing would be cool

do they even sell recycle any more?

thelocalhost · Post by **thelocalhost** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:35 pm

JACKAL & HYDE wrote:
RhythmSickness wrote:
JACKAL & HYDE wrote: Why does everyone bitch about "tempo automation" in Live like it doesnt have it. Live has full blown easy as hell to use tempo automation.
shame about the time signature automation eh

Not really for me and 10,000,000 other producers world wide. Maybe if I were doing classical/jazz pieces or scoring a drama. But for Rock, Pop, Industrial, Techno, hiphop etc automating the time signature is totally irrelevant and wouldnt be used 99.999% of the time. So for me, not a "shame" at all.

This guy is too much.

thelocalhost · Post by **thelocalhost** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:38 pm

Tone Deft wrote: You madame cannot counter the fact that nobody listens to prog rock that doesn't live in their mom's basement.

You and Jackal&Hyde should get together and go bowling.

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:44 pm

thelocalhost wrote:You and Jackal&Hyde should get together and go bowling.

Fuck it, let's go bowling.

Boss is out this week, you guys have to deal with it.

noisetonepause · Post by **noisetonepause** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:57 pm

Hm. I always thought that prog rock was the worst thing ever invented... that is, till somebody sugested making it in Reason.

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:03 am

ReProg

gaspode · Post by **gaspode** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:09 am

forge wrote: the whole virtual rack concept is fine and great idea, they dont need to try and be another audio sequencer or arranger, but they could at least let their samplers SAMPLE!

And yet there are so many samplers out there that cannot sample...

rbmonosylabik · Post by **rbmonosylabik** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:14 am

Someone should start a prog rock contest using Reason

JACKAL & HYDE · Post by **JACKAL & HYDE** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:18 am

rbmonosylabik wrote:Someone should start a prog rock contest using Reason

There should be a requirement of at least 20 automated time signature changes per song.

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:23 am

JACKAL & HYDE wrote:
rbmonosylabik wrote:Someone should start a prog rock contest using Reason
There should be a requirement of at least 20 automated time signature changes per song.

Entries with lyrics not including dragons, trolls or talking trees are immediately disqualified.

rbmonosylabik · Post by **rbmonosylabik** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:54 am

Tone Deft wrote:Entries with lyrics not including dragons, trolls or talking trees are immediately disqualified.

GTFO. This is no Power Metal Reason contest.