dual monitors, dual processor
dual monitors, dual processor
Hi
I'm looking to upgrade from my 1.73 ghz pentium M computer (laptop) up to a dual processor desktop. Also, rather than get one large monitor (1600x1200 pixels), I could get 2 cheap smallish monitors and have a combined resolution of 2560x1024 or vertically: 1280 x 2048.
but, how would the live screen appear on such a setup?, would it just be split straight down the middle?
If you use a dual monitor setup, do you find it works well with live?
P.S. my current monitor is 1200 x 800.
I'm looking to upgrade from my 1.73 ghz pentium M computer (laptop) up to a dual processor desktop. Also, rather than get one large monitor (1600x1200 pixels), I could get 2 cheap smallish monitors and have a combined resolution of 2560x1024 or vertically: 1280 x 2048.
but, how would the live screen appear on such a setup?, would it just be split straight down the middle?
If you use a dual monitor setup, do you find it works well with live?
P.S. my current monitor is 1200 x 800.
-
sweetjesus
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
hey
if you wait till end of july, you should be able to afford a quad core cpu for the price of current dual cores.
live sux on a dual screen at the moment. i use it best in that capacity by putting fx etc on one monitor and live on another.
if i could do it all over again i would get one bigass screen.
if you wait till end of july, you should be able to afford a quad core cpu for the price of current dual cores.
live sux on a dual screen at the moment. i use it best in that capacity by putting fx etc on one monitor and live on another.
if i could do it all over again i would get one bigass screen.
thanks, i'll wait and see what happens at the end of july, plus i'll go for one big monitor. I suppose even going to 1024 vertical pixels from my current 800 pixels will make a big difference. At the moment, I seem to spend a lot of time resizing the 'frames' within live (esp. in arrange view)!!!!!!!!
-
sweetjesus
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
yup
try to save yourself a few shitty moments and just get ASUS for all the parts (motherboard, video card etc) and motherboard preferrably intel p5k and up (dont get 965 chipsets).
i saw you're looking into a rackmount case.
get one where the internal components are shock resiliant as opposed to rigid fixtures.
if you take it to a show, you dont want the sub bass making your hard disk platters dance to the beat.
try to save yourself a few shitty moments and just get ASUS for all the parts (motherboard, video card etc) and motherboard preferrably intel p5k and up (dont get 965 chipsets).
i saw you're looking into a rackmount case.
get one where the internal components are shock resiliant as opposed to rigid fixtures.
if you take it to a show, you dont want the sub bass making your hard disk platters dance to the beat.
I'm using one 20" widescreen and one 17" monitor side by side, and this is an awesome setup - one monitor for Live/VSTs and one for Reason. It's very handy, cause you can maximise one app on one monitor and one on the other - also, it's great to keep those pesky VSTs away from the session/arrangement viewSyntheme wrote:thanks, i'll wait and see what happens at the end of july, plus i'll go for one big monitor. I suppose even going to 1024 vertical pixels from my current 800 pixels will make a big difference. At the moment, I seem to spend a lot of time resizing the 'frames' within live (esp. in arrange view)!!!!!!!!
I'm not completely up to date on the monitor front, but last time I checked, you still got a lot more pixels for the money with two smaller monitors as opposed to one large.