OSX optimazations???
OSX optimazations???
Does anybody know of any tips or any online tutorials for making OSX run better with audio applications such as Live? I have seen tutorials on the net for WinXP and what not but I was wondering if some of the same things could be done with OSX to get it to run more efficiently.
-
noisetonepause
- Posts: 4938
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:38 pm
- Location: Sticks and stones
-
Johnisfaster
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
go into your system preferences and cllck on energy saver. then click options. set it to "highest" processor performance.
you might want to disable all your widgets too. do a google search to figure out how that works.
you might want to disable all your widgets too. do a google search to figure out how that works.
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.
Doesn't OSX look for updates in the middle of the night? You wouldn't want that to happen when you are doing that late night set.
no prevailing genre of music:
http://alonetone.com/glu
http://alonetone.com/glu
Re: OSX optimazations???
DJSK wrote:Does anybody know of any tips or any online tutorials for making OSX run better with audio applications such as Live? I have seen tutorials on the net for WinXP and what not but I was wondering if some of the same things could be done with OSX to get it to run more efficiently.
My advice if on a notebook (ie: Mac Laptop) is dead simple.
1.Run all audio off an external hard drive = less heat and lower chance of CPU throttling due to heat dispersion in the notebook (though this holds true on any notebook be they PC or Mac based.
2.RAM RAM RAM - you wanna maximize OSX then run your machine on the highest amount of HIGH QUALITY RAM you can afford.
OSX runs pretty efficiently out of the Box (and this is coming out of the mouth of a general PC user) - trust me though the RAM will make a HUGE Difference.
Somewhere between a rock and a hard place is actually nowhere.
these days one should stay away from altering the OS - the computers are fast enough and the OS provides routines to manage the load better than most users could do.
you should make sure the OSX is not automatically searching for updates (preference pane) and that there is no distant storage connected (iDisk) as this needs network access. Also when I have problems with performance I turn of the network (preference pane) which gives me a slightly better performance - so during bounces and finalizing this might be an option.
RAM, intelligent HD space management, are the really influences .....
oh, I also run the scripts from time to time and repair permissios from time to time (and always before and after updates and installs)
hope that helps
best
you should make sure the OSX is not automatically searching for updates (preference pane) and that there is no distant storage connected (iDisk) as this needs network access. Also when I have problems with performance I turn of the network (preference pane) which gives me a slightly better performance - so during bounces and finalizing this might be an option.
RAM, intelligent HD space management, are the really influences .....
oh, I also run the scripts from time to time and repair permissios from time to time (and always before and after updates and installs)
hope that helps
best
-
Johnisfaster
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
how might I turn that off? I'd like to.leonard wrote:you could try turning off mdutil - i think thats the disk utility which spotlight uses to index etx. you'll notice i ts a liittle process which runs in the background chewing up memory and cpu. the tradeoff is that spotlight will stop working once it's off.
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.
Or better yet, http://d-t-f.sourceforge.net. Lets you turn off dashboard, too.leonard wrote:this is courtesy of someone else, but..
go to terminal:
type sudo pico /etc/hostconfig
change the line:
SPOTLIGHT=-YES-
to:
SPOTLIGHT=-NO-
save and close, type:
sudo mdutil -i off /
then:
sudo mdutil -E /
then restart, you shold be good to go.
I'm not sure how much ruth there is in this,, but i was told to turn the clock off if it is visible in the tool bar,,
The guy that told me this has done it to all of his studio macs,, i have done it to my G5 tower,, but i'm not sure if it does make much difference,,,
The external hard drive to write to is about the best advise you can take,, my MBP gets very hot after a couple of hours not using one reading and writing to the internal drive,,
Mmmm,, very warm nuts!!!
The guy that told me this has done it to all of his studio macs,, i have done it to my G5 tower,, but i'm not sure if it does make much difference,,,
The external hard drive to write to is about the best advise you can take,, my MBP gets very hot after a couple of hours not using one reading and writing to the internal drive,,
Mmmm,, very warm nuts!!!
15" 2.4 MBP/Live/Sampler/Operator/ Home made Dumble clone/Two Strats/One Jazz Bass.
Come and visit any time= Soundcloud
Come and visit any time= Soundcloud
That sounds extraordinarily superstitious. I'm sure that it can't hurt to do this, but the odds of the system clock using any more than 1% of CPU resources at any given time are very unlikely.Homebelly wrote:I'm not sure how much ruth there is in this,, but i was told to turn the clock off if it is visible in the tool bar,,
The guy that told me this has done it to all of his studio macs,, i have done it to my G5 tower,, but i'm not sure if it does make much difference,,,
You could disable NTP (network time protocol) in OSX's system preferences, which probably result in slightly less CPU load, but again, the savings will likely be rather insignificant.
Yeah I use mine to make tea sometimes.The external hard drive to write to is about the best advise you can take,, my MBP gets very hot after a couple of hours not using one reading and writing to the internal drive,,
Mmmm,, very warm nuts!!!
I remember writing a clock program in basic on a 32k computer in about 1985sqook wrote: I'm sure that it can't hurt to do this, but the odds of the system clock using any more than 1% of CPU resources at any given time are very unlikely.
a digital watch wouldnt be anywhere near 32k
I think 1% of a modern CPU is WAY overestimating
maybe he's thinking of the "internet time" sync - but AFAIK they only link up about 1ce a week and that wouldnt need much resources