BIG Sound Problem
BIG Sound Problem
hi .
I have compared the same track in wavelab,nuendo 3,cubase 4+3 & ableton ,and I got to say ableton sound engine is the worst!!!.
there is no transient and no depth, also there is a cut out frequencies in the high & low spectrum.
there is no life in the sound compared to the other app.
how can I fix this BIG PROBLEMS.
what is the reason to the difference?
is there a way to switch to another sound engine?
I have compared the same track in wavelab,nuendo 3,cubase 4+3 & ableton ,and I got to say ableton sound engine is the worst!!!.
there is no transient and no depth, also there is a cut out frequencies in the high & low spectrum.
there is no life in the sound compared to the other app.
how can I fix this BIG PROBLEMS.
what is the reason to the difference?
is there a way to switch to another sound engine?
-
Pitch Black
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 2:18 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
is it your track you're listening to in these daw's? or just a normal wave- or mp3-file?
so my guess is:
a) you're deaf
b) you didn't remove your q-tips
c) in case of a wave- or mp3-file: choose re-pitch-mode in clip-pref.
d) in case of your own track: learn how to mix a track down. or learn how to write trance-bass-lines
e) any plug-ins on the master? on the tracks?
f) did i mentioned that? you're deaf.......
so if you can bring more details, it's easier to reply.........no worry.
so my guess is:
a) you're deaf
b) you didn't remove your q-tips
c) in case of a wave- or mp3-file: choose re-pitch-mode in clip-pref.
d) in case of your own track: learn how to mix a track down. or learn how to write trance-bass-lines
e) any plug-ins on the master? on the tracks?
f) did i mentioned that? you're deaf.......
so if you can bring more details, it's easier to reply.........no worry.
regards,
thom
thom
I think your the deaf one!!!BASSbüro wrote:is it your track you're listening to in these daw's? or just a normal wave- or mp3-file?
so my guess is:
a) you're deaf
b) you didn't remove your q-tips
c) in case of a wave- or mp3-file: choose re-pitch-mode in clip-pref.
d) in case of your own track: learn how to mix a track down. or learn how to write trance-bass-lines
e) any plug-ins on the master? on the tracks?
f) did i mentioned that? you're deaf.......
so if you can bring more details, it's easier to reply.........no worry.
is this a joke?
Got any particulars for us, or just "problems in frequency spectrum"?
Thats a lot of gear, I suspect you can use it to give us some details.
Switching a sound engine? I've never heard of a program that switches sound engines. Neither has wikipedia, and google is fairly generic on the term.
Got any particulars for us, or just "problems in frequency spectrum"?
Thats a lot of gear, I suspect you can use it to give us some details.
Switching a sound engine? I've never heard of a program that switches sound engines. Neither has wikipedia, and google is fairly generic on the term.
b_ara_ki:
ok, i did the test with a "superfunk feat. ron carroll - lucky star" 16 bit wave file. ok, i know, a bit cheeeesy, but this tune has a monster base-line.
ableton:
16 bit, 44.1, warp-mode is off (in clip-view), no efx
wavelab:
16 bit, 44.1, no efx
fl-studio:
16 bit, 44.1, no efx
audio-interface:
motu-ultralight
monitors:
adam p11
sorry, dude, i don't hear a fuckin' different. even the heard reverb is identical. the bass is smooth and the transients aren't shaved in both daw's. sounds crystal clear in both daw's.
what's wrong?
ok, i did the test with a "superfunk feat. ron carroll - lucky star" 16 bit wave file. ok, i know, a bit cheeeesy, but this tune has a monster base-line.
ableton:
16 bit, 44.1, warp-mode is off (in clip-view), no efx
wavelab:
16 bit, 44.1, no efx
fl-studio:
16 bit, 44.1, no efx
audio-interface:
motu-ultralight
monitors:
adam p11
sorry, dude, i don't hear a fuckin' different. even the heard reverb is identical. the bass is smooth and the transients aren't shaved in both daw's. sounds crystal clear in both daw's.
what's wrong?
regards,
thom
thom
This poster had specific DETAILS when he posted about the shortcoming of Live's ability to resample audio.
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... mple+audio
The significance of said details were still arguable... but people could discuss more than "sounds good. No it doesn't. yes it does. No it doesn't"
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... mple+audio
The significance of said details were still arguable... but people could discuss more than "sounds good. No it doesn't. yes it does. No it doesn't"