TrentReznor - more :*( [niggy tardust sales V radiohead etc]

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
b0unce
Posts: 5379
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:16 pm

TrentReznor - more :*( [niggy tardust sales V radiohead etc]

Post by b0unce » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:40 am

Trent Reznor is a ballless sanitised nonce who wants to be a multi-millionaire but with all the street credibility of a homeless hepatitis C infected anarchist,,, we all know that... moaning about the music industry like he's small-fry and how it stifles his creativity etc whilst simultaniously jerking off into piles of unmarked $100 bills. Well, here's some more of it:
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9847788-7.html


here's yer man Saul Williams speaking on the same topic:
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-984853 ... l?tag=head


discuss
spreader of butter

Action Jackson
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:07 pm

Post by Action Jackson » Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:31 am

Did Trent Reznor pee in your cereal or something? What's your point? Multi-millionaires don't have the right to be disappointed on record sales or multi-millionaires shouldn't try new distribution methods and voice their opinion if the album didn't sell as well as it could have?

Machinesworking
Posts: 11551
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by Machinesworking » Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:31 am

Williams said it best, Reznor is the king of emo.
$140,000 profit initially is nothing to sneeze at.

Martyn
Posts: 2505
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 11:22 am
Location: UK

Re: TrentReznor - more :*( [niggy tardust sales V radiohead

Post by Martyn » Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:32 am

b0unce wrote:
discuss
To compare the sale of a NIN collaboration (I've not heard it) with that of a Radiohead album can only lead to a comparison of the fanbase, types of personality have to factor into the differnce in sales figures. Are Radiohead fans likely to be more conciencious than NIN fans? Are they likely to care enough about the recording quality of Reznor's angst ridden sreeching over Thom Yorke's depressed wailling to pay more for a quality recording? Did people get the low quality download first, decide that it was actually a bit shit and then spend some money on a pizza instead? It'd be a more interesting and relevant experiment to do the same thing with a new, fresh (popular) artist rather than somebody so obviously past his sell-by date. I was a fan of NIN for years but it's been well over in that camp for a long time now as far as I'm concerned, this doesn't surprise me at all, Reznor should probably take heed and just stop.

mdk
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Skopje, Macedonia
Contact:

Post by mdk » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:08 pm

i dont think he realises it just wasnt particularly good.

if it was good id have payed for it but i heard the early release tracks and didnt like it.

still, $140,000 isnt a bad income on something like that..fuck, id love to just make $140 from a record.
Pr0k Records - Bandcamp Facebook Twitter

mdk
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Skopje, Macedonia
Contact:

Post by mdk » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:13 pm

and its only in 2 months..70k a month. i could handle that.
Pr0k Records - Bandcamp Facebook Twitter

dinsync
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 2:30 pm

Post by dinsync » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:18 pm

The worst is that Reznor wants to take money directly from every internet users pocket by taxing ISP's:

"I think if there was an ISP tax of some sort, we can say to the consumer, 'All music is now available and able to be downloaded and put in your car and put in your iPod and put up your a-- if you want and it's $5 on your cable bill.'"

Remember all tax = force - you pay the tax or the government will throw your ass in jail. Resist jail and eventually you'll end up dead.

Reznor is all ready to use the force of government to get his way.

chrysalis33rpm
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by chrysalis33rpm » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:33 pm

Trent sounds whiny, Saul sounds excited. Interesting how the same events for the same team can come across so differently.

Its weird that Reznor talks like it's Williams' music, he's so disappointed for Saul's album, etc. It seems clear to me that NIN is a much bigger name than Saul Williams.

chrysalis33rpm
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by chrysalis33rpm » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:37 pm

@dinsync: Yeah, the idea of a tax to FORCE people to pay for music strikes me as really wierd and like it should be the antithesis of what Reznor stands for. I mean, who's going to distribute that tax to the artists? F*ing right, the gov't and the record companies after a fat cut- and who decides what cut an artist gets? Who decides who's even an artist? Seems like a dumb idea.

stutter
Posts: 488
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:58 pm

Post by stutter » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:20 pm

I wonder if more than 20% of people who get an album on any format pay for it anymore?

funkdefino
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:29 pm

Post by funkdefino » Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:39 pm

How about reading what Mr. Reznor has to say about all of this directly from his own website?

http://www.nin.com/
What is that? A .38?

38, 39, whatever it takes.

Akshara
Posts: 377
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:16 pm

Post by Akshara » Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:19 pm

That article Reznor links to is excellent.

chrysalis33rpm
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by chrysalis33rpm » Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:23 pm

^^^Yes,and apparently Reznor thinks his position on the ISP tax was vastly exagerrated.

jackjack
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 7:14 am

Post by jackjack » Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:54 pm

edited. forget it.

Martyn
Posts: 2505
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 11:22 am
Location: UK

Post by Martyn » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:25 pm

Akshara wrote:That article Reznor links to is excellent.
Most definitely! So good I'm going to give it it's own thread.

It does look as if TR got a bit of a bad press experience there, just goes to show how easy it is to spread misinformation.

Post Reply