FRESH HOT ANAL FUCKING AAARGH!!!!!

[sporkles]

thanks for YOUR contribution, really creative whining you've got going.
I wish more people were like you, then this forum would be all kinds of fun.

Nice picture - very creative. I give it a B+. Had the girl to the right not been
giving her index, you'd gotten an A. Let me flip you one too:



Edit: Image changed, out of consideration for my revered, but oh so fragile
mentor, Tone Deft

[Tone Deft]

that's pretty fucked up, what you consider beautiful and acceptable to post is best reserved for serial killers and sick little boys who pull the wings off of flies. you think THAT is OK but women in bikinis are offensive?

[sporkles]

that's pretty fucked up, what you consider beautiful and acceptable to post is best reserved for serial killers and sick little boys who pull the wings off of flies. you think THAT is OK but women in bikinis are offensive?

I'm really sorry that I hurt your feelings. Really. Now don't let me distract you
any further - I know you have important work to do, scrutinising the web for
pithy and clever images of scantily clad women.

[forge]

hmm,

Chauvinism (pronounced /ˈʃoʊvɪnɪzm̩/) is extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of a group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards a rival group.

I don't think that anyone is proposing hatred of any other group, precisely the opposite in fact
There's a difference between sexist and sexy.

Oh, come on! Belittling and objectifying is indeed a form of hatred. Okay,
let's start quoting dictionaries, shall we?

chau·vin·ism
n.
1. Militant devotion to and glorification of one's country; fanatical patriotism.
2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own gender, group, or kind

Finding a woman in any of the innumerable pictures posted on this forum
sexy is not sexism, but posting those pictures on this forum is. It
shows blatant lack of respect for women.
Sexism/chauvinism involves reducing women (or men, theoretically, but let's
be realistic) to objects of ridicule and "desire". And that's what's happening
on this forum - it's a boy's club extraordinare.

yeah I always find this attitude amusing

it is without your realising based on an assumption that the 'type of girls' who pose for the piuctures are worthless and not capable of making their own decisions and thus need 'protecting' by people like you

have you ever actually met a girl who has worked in the sex industry - and I'm not talking about sex slaves or drug addicts - contrary to popular belief there are actually quite a lot of women out there who do it just for the cash and often fund their way through university degrees etc etc

in fact I think there is a good argument that they are the ones exploiting men - think about it for a second - men are the ones who are dominated and crippled by their own sexulity enough to the extent that we are so easily manipulated and stripped of our money just by the mention of sex or pictures of sexy women

women are very aware of this male weakness and are all the time exploiting it, and women who make money from that have actually taken it one step further and decided to cash in on the crippling male sex drive

quite a cynical and calculated act IMO - but I dont really blame them

[PLassTIC|sPOONs]

these wimmin isnt scanty clad

[xrayfish]

these wimmin isnt scanty clad

at last, a post that's on-topic




____________

[Tone Deft]

oh come now Sporkles, stand up for what you believe in. I'm not so easily shocked (I watch 2 girls 1 cup while I eat my breakfast cereal) the point is which is more acceptable, sex or violence? I thought that was pretty punk rock to post that pic, now you've turned boy band on me.


for the uninformed, Sporkles laid down a gif of a finger that had been 'golved' between the 1st and 2nd knuckles, that is to say the skin had been pulled back down to the bone.

[sporkles]

yeah I always find this attitude amusing

I'm sure you do.

it is without your realising based on an assumption that the 'type of girls' who pose for the piuctures are worthless and not capable of making their own decisions and thus need 'protecting' by people like you

If you're going to join in, at least take the time to read what I'm actually
writing - ref. all parties involved, yada, yada, yada. I'm not talking about
the women depicted, but how posting such pictures on a forum like this
doesn't make any sense.

in fact I think there is a good argument that they are the ones exploiting men - think about it for a second - men are the ones who are dominated and crippled by their own sexulity enough to the extent that we are so easily manipulated and stripped of our money just by the mention of sex or pictures of sexy women

Certainly. And yet, the women in these "pictures of sexy women" only
account for a small percentage of the total female part of the population.
Women working in the porn biz are not exactly in majority, and since male
sex drive is what fuels the industry, most women are not cashing in on the
male defined ideal woman - on the contrary, they're actually paying for it, in
the perpetual struggle to look "hot".
I'm not trying to pose as the Great Saviour of Women here, but try to
imagine how it would be if you were an average Western woman, who
happened to be a Live user who joined the forum. Comprised by "average"
woman would be the constant reminder (by pictures such as the ones in
question) that you aren't good looking enough for the male members. Would you feel encouraged to keep browsing the forum when constantly
bombarded by such pictures? (No, I'm not saying that the people posting
and hooting about the pictures are in real life what they profess to be, but
the online persona is the only persona we get to see.)

I know that trying to offer an alternative view on this on a forum like this is
like trying to convert Iran to Christianity, so I think I've said my final word
on this.

[thefool]

horny!

edit: post nb 500

[sporkles]

oh come now Sporkles, stand up for what you believe in. I'm not so easily shocked (I watch 2 girls 1 cup while I eat my breakfast cereal) the point is which is more acceptable, sex or violence? I thought that was pretty punk rock to post that pic, now you've turned boy band on me.


for the uninformed, Sporkles laid down a gif of a finger that had been 'golved' between the 1st and 2nd knuckles, that is to say the skin had been pulled back down to the bone.

Yikes! I realise that I should never have gotten involved in this. I don't have
the patience to sit this one out. If my forum kung-fu were a little better, I'd
have sucked it up, gone to some gay porn image site to find a lot of nekkid
hunk pictures, and start posting them here. I'm sure that would be
appreciated. Unfortunately, I don't think it would be worth the painstaking
effort of having to actually find the pictures...

I don't think Davey H will have the desired effect.

[ze2be]

This one goes on Mtv over here right now:
http://www.stage6.com/user/Arancia/vide ... uncensored

[Angstrom]

but try to
imagine how it would be if you were an average Western woman, who
happened to be a Live user who joined the forum. Comprised by "average"
woman would be the constant reminder (by pictures such as the ones in
question) that you aren't good looking enough for the male members.

so in this hypothetical situation, a woman joins and based on the (rather stupid images posted in this thread) she worries if she is good looking enough for the male forum users ???


holy crap,
get this hypothetical woman some psychiatric help immediately!



now, I never normally post daft images of women, but this thread in particular took a turn for the stupid from the start and seemed an appropriate place for ludicrous animated gifs. And I think that the images that real forum user post are generally very mild. There's very unlikely to be nudity involved for instance, you would see more flesh in a ladies haircare commercial.

also, any sensitive soul should looking inside a thread titled "anal glove puppetry" or whatever it is called, well they are obviously looking for a change of direction in their lives.

I'm loving the Hasselpooches though.
needs more animation and possibly a caption.

[dcease]

...sorry, just sick of this shit..

Its bad enough that they don't monitor the forums to delete the threads quickly, but totally unacceptable that they haven't even bothered banning all the rude words.

Its a built in feature with phpBB and would take them all of 5 minutes to do.

fuck off. who the fuck are you? go to a x-tian forum you want no cussin. pussy.

[dcease]

hmm,

Chauvinism (pronounced /ˈʃoʊvɪnɪzm̩/) is extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of a group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards a rival group.

I don't think that anyone is proposing hatred of any other group, precisely the opposite in fact
There's a difference between sexist and sexy.

Oh, come on! Belittling and objectifying is indeed a form of hatred. Okay,
let's start quoting dictionaries, shall we?

chau·vin·ism
n.
1. Militant devotion to and glorification of one's country; fanatical patriotism.
2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own gender, group, or kind

Finding a woman in any of the innumerable pictures posted on this forum
sexy is not sexism, but posting those pictures on this forum is. It
shows blatant lack of respect for women.
Sexism/chauvinism involves reducing women (or men, theoretically, but let's
be realistic) to objects of ridicule and "desire". And that's what's happening
on this forum - it's a boy's club extraordinare.

got your tickets to lilith fair?

[dcease]

incorrect

the idea that posting images of women reduces all women to only the specific trait that is illustrated in that image is erroneous. It merely illustrates that particular trait, one that we enjoy.
And interpreting an image which demonstrates one mode of the totality of womanhood in such a fervently anti-man way says more about you than it does about anyone else.

Example:

Incorrect Interpretation : all women are businesswomen, and no more

Incorrect Interpretation : all women are mountaineers, and no more

The reason that men post images of women looking sexual is because heterosexual men enjoy women being and looking sexual. That is logical natural mammalian behaviour.

That behaviour does not in any way 'reduce' all women to that mode, it merely illustrates that mode. Pretending that it is anything else is ludicrous, bizarre and comes from outmoded 1970's era feminism.

Modern feminism is very different. Both of those luscious breast images were sent to me by my girlfriend. Who is a burlesque dancer. I'd be interested to hear your ill informed ideas about that occupation.

Nice. Are you trying to bate me into talking shite about your girlfriend? As long as all parties involved are voluntarily involved, I don't even mind hardcore pornography. If the majority of pictures posted of women on this forum aren't reductive, how come they all seem to focus on the exact same thing?
What I'm talking about here is how so many people complain about the pornography bot posts – which usually have very revealing topic titles, so avoiding them is pretty damn easy – while most of the tackiest pictures are in fact provided by actual users, often without any sort of connection to the actual topic. I'm not the one saying that all women are (insert fitting adjective or noun). I'm talking about the view on women that is presented through their pictorial representation on the forum.

Oh, yes – very clever posting that picture of a businesswoman. You really got me there. Why don't you start posting pictures of businesswomen completely out of context, then? The pictures posted of women here are almost exclusively of a sexual nature, reducing women to a stereotypical mould, i.e. big tits, slim waist, etc. Most of the remaining 5% or so are of women found by the poster to be "ugly". How is this not ridiculing women? Altogether, there are surprisingly few businesswomen and mountaineers pictured on this forum – possibly because they don't have a whole lot to do with music production. On the whole, I really don't find this forum all that inviting to women – or to anyone who doesn't conform to the (insecure) heterosexual man (perhaps 'boy' is more fitting) mentality, considering the amazing number of occurrences of words like "tits" and "gay", the latter always denoting a negative attitude towards something.

Oh – this one is so good that I have to quote it one more time:

The reason that men post images of women looking sexual is because heterosexual men enjoy women being and looking sexual. That is logical natural mammalian behaviour.

So the first instinct of a male mammal who's attracted to a female mammal is to post a nude picture of her on the internet? Get real!

Look - I know I'm wasting my time here. I merely chimed in on the debate. I'm not out to police the board or anything - I'd just like to see at least a shred of creativity when posting here just for the sake of banter. I like a bit of banter as much as anyone, but a huge percentage of what's being posted here is pure bollocks.

fuck off. you look at kiddy porn. that's why you are offended. this was our fun thread... quit ruining it with your debate.