New Celemony preview --- anyone's seen this?

Corn Swabler · Post by **Corn Swabler** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:06 pm

My drums don't use any cords, what are you guys talking about? Reason uses cords though, they are rad, they jingle when you spin it around really fast.

You crazy guys don't need beardy-mans software, it's for chumps.

Atomikat · Post by **Atomikat** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:06 pm

Definitely I'll upgrade when it comes out...

Look Mom !!! no hands...

I can sing better than Cher now...

Sales Dude McBoob · Post by **Sales Dude McBoob** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:14 pm

Neat. My mind is scrambling to come up with the most useless applications that this could be used for. Like taking a recording of a bunch of birds and singling out each tweet.

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:18 pm

Sales Dude McBoob wrote:Neat. My mind is scrambling to come up with the most useless applications that this could be used for. Like taking a recording of a bunch of birds and singling out each tweet.

BT already does this, and he quatizes it to 256ths.

Bassic Dave · Post by **Bassic Dave** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:23 pm

Angstrom wrote:this is why I am so disappointed with Ableton.
Because in over 8 years of trying they have consistently failed to deliver beards as impressive as this. Do they even have a functional beard of any kind? I'm not sure that they do. Not even a meagre goatee or one of those porno underhang things. Perhaps the Cycling 74 project will deliver, otherwise they will be lagging a long way behind the competition. That is quite obvious.

OK, enough bullshit. that was fucking amazing. I would have bet anyone money that this was impossible. Seems I would be wrong. I love his quote.

the more I pondered the subject, I began to see that what doesn't work in theory can work in reality
You have to respect the guy for some serious groundbreaking! "hmmm, for impossible you will have to give me a few extra days" . I think this looks like an essential purchase ... as long as I don;t have to splash out on 'studio' to get it.

------------------------
Hilarious!!!
At work laughing like an idiot!

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:31 pm

Bassic Dave wrote:
Angstrom wrote:this is why I am so disappointed with Ableton.
Because in over 8 years of trying they have consistently failed to deliver beards as impressive as this. Do they even have a functional beard of any kind? I'm not sure that they do. Not even a meagre goatee or one of those porno underhang things. Perhaps the Cycling 74 project will deliver, otherwise they will be lagging a long way behind the competition. That is quite obvious.

OK, enough bullshit. that was fucking amazing. I would have bet anyone money that this was impossible. Seems I would be wrong. I love his quote.

the more I pondered the subject, I began to see that what doesn't work in theory can work in reality
You have to respect the guy for some serious groundbreaking! "hmmm, for impossible you will have to give me a few extra days" . I think this looks like an essential purchase ... as long as I don;t have to splash out on 'studio' to get it.
------------------------
Hilarious!!!
At work laughing like an idiot!

oh puhleeeze...the dude doesn't even talk to anyone without facial hair...

penningt · Post by **penningt** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:41 pm

Re mixing up a whole song ...

Melodyne web site Q&A wrote:Q: How about mixed signals i.e. where you have a piano and a guitar on the same track?

A: Direct Note Access recognizes notes in their harmonic and temporal contexts. It cannot detect which instrument has played which note. So if a piano and a guitar play the same note at the same time, you cannot edit the guitar separately. With Direct Note Access, you can access the note itself, which in this case means the signal of both instruments.

I'd like to understand how something that is not possible in theory can be possible in reality. I feel sceptical about that statement.

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:44 pm

penningt wrote:Re mixing up a whole song ...
Melodyne web site Q&A wrote:Q: How about mixed signals i.e. where you have a piano and a guitar on the same track?

A: Direct Note Access recognizes notes in their harmonic and temporal contexts. It cannot detect which instrument has played which note. So if a piano and a guitar play the same note at the same time, you cannot edit the guitar separately. With Direct Note Access, you can access the note itself, which in this case means the signal of both instruments.
I'd like to understand how something that is not possible in theory can be possible in reality. I feel sceptical about that statement.

Muggle alert! *sigh* goddamn muggles...

eisnein · Post by **eisnein** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:47 pm

meeeedeee. on your meeeeedeee keyboard!

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:49 pm

eisnein wrote:meeeedeee. on your meeeeedeee keyboard!

I was laughing about that too...

tw1nstates · Post by **tw1nstates** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:51 pm

HOLY FUCK I CAN FINALLY UNMIX THE PAINT!!!!!!!

SIDECHAINING MY HEAD SO I SOUND LIKE DAFT PUNK MACHINE IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER;.

WHOOEEE ISNT THE FUTURE JUST FUTURESOME!.

Sorry excuse my exitability.

I wonder how it works with full tracks, half way through the vid t the moment.

Is it an extract the accapella machine??? (hence my unmix the paint comment)

HA HA HA

kb420 · Post by **kb420** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:53 pm

I simply do not believe what I just saw. It had to be a fake video. I'll have to try the demo once it's released.

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:54 pm

well, I don't think this can unmix a mix...but it seems to work off multiple pitches, ideally the same instrument...I see this as being great for changing notes in single tracks, be they guitars, pianos, drums, or say multiple backing vocals submixed. But as another poster said, if you have a track that's got piano and guitar, and they play the same notes, you can move the notes, but you can't separate the instruments.

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:55 pm

kb420 wrote:I simply do not believe what I just saw. It had to be a fake video. I'll have to try the demo once it's released.

did you squeeze your nuts really tight to make sure you weren't dreaming?

I did.

Clearscreen · Post by **Clearscreen** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:58 pm

tw1nstates wrote:Is it an extract the accapella machine???

not exactly. it seems it'll separate sound into notes, not instruments. so if you have two instruments playing the same note at the same time then those two instruments would appear as a single blob in melodyne and changing one would also change the other. it's possible depending on the tune though - guess we'll have to wait and see whats possible when they release it...