Now that is an encouraging response. Especially seeing as everyone else seems to think its a no-go. 800$ compared to the what, $2000 that a macpro costs? Hardly any competition really.madhattared wrote:Just because there is a price difference doesn't mean the performance is substantially better for the Xeons.fewture wrote:Just to note, the price difference in Xeon 5400 and the q6600 is substantial - if someone wants to fairly compare the mac pro, then you need to find systems with the same specs (not similar specs). All the other companies systems with xeon's are a lot more than their normal intel desktop ranges.nebulae wrote: On the desktop side, I have a Quadcore q6600 that I built with quality parts, and a comparable Mac Pro would have doubled my price.
.
I have a hackintosh at home. It is rock solid with Live and is the fastest computer I've ever built. It took me 12 hours start to finish to get the machine built and osx stable with dual monitors nvidia drivers, network and sound driver which can all be found at the insanely mac forums. It is much cheaper then the hardware apple sells, especially considering their desktops.
WD Raptor + Q6600 eats Live for breakfast.
All said the chip, mobo, and two hard drives (raptor and 750gig) cost me 800$. I had all the other parts lying around already.
Take the plunge, you can spend the money you save on other gear.
Tbh, I kind of resent paying a company to build my computer, seeing as I can do it myself. A lot of people have said things like "but you get help when it breaks" etc. But in my experience that 'help' isnt worth the extra cash. Especially when you buy a macbook that is basically made out of papier machet and play-doh. This thing has more cracks in it than a hostel for retired rent-boys, everyone I know that has a macbook has some damage to the chassis. (just as an example, this is not the only reason I want to build my own computer)
