A friend of mine pointed this out.
When adding EQ4 to an audio track there no audible changes until you start moving the different bands. When an EQ3 is added to an audio track there is a noticable difference in sound right away, even though the EQ dials are at 0.
As a DJ I like the EQ3 because its controls are exactly what I need. But I would prefer that when the knobs are at 0, the audio be exactly the same as if it wasn't there instead of boosting the sound.
I feel this implimentation would be more ideal.
EQ3 recommendation
EQ3 recommendation
Accidents are the portal to discovery!
-
serotoninsteve
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:27 pm
- Location: Luxembourg
Yes thats because they wanted to make it more analoge sounding, a switch where you could set up a flat response would be nice.
And to have the +-0dB position at 12 oclock instead of past 15min, like on a regular mixer would be nice too, perhaps you could build an eq3 II with more user selectable features?
Greetings
Steve
And to have the +-0dB position at 12 oclock instead of past 15min, like on a regular mixer would be nice too, perhaps you could build an eq3 II with more user selectable features?
Greetings
Steve
MBP 15,4" 2,53GHz C2D 4Gb late 2008 / Mac OS X.6.2 / Novation Remote 37SL Compact / TriggerFinger / FaderfoxDJ2 / Padkontrol / UC33 / SM Audio TB202 / Audiofire2 / Apogee Duet / Event OPAL's / HD25 /